You know who is the only person on the list that has a chance, right? This has nothing to do with opinion, mine or yours.
But we do know now that Hillary doesn't need to run, so no need to bring her up anymore. Even a bunch (over 20%) of Bernie supporters will go for it
It's probably the only peaceable way out of this
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 23 2020, @01:27AM (8 children)
Because that is who you are going to be voting for in 9 months. If she keeps feeling the "urge" that is. Literally the only thing that would stop you from voting for her is if she decides not to run.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 23 2020, @02:01AM
*Smirk* Dream on. While I did vote for her in 2016, I have no intention of doing so again in 2020. I will go third party before I choose her on the ballot this time around..
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 23 2020, @04:44AM (6 children)
You're buggin'!
I hate to break it to you, but it's *way* too late for new folks to get into the Democratic primaries. Filing deadlines for state primaries/caucuses have all passed except for those in Montana (9 March 2020), Nebraska (12 March 2020), New Mexico (30 March 2020) and Oregon (10 March 2020) (Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_for_presidential_candidates). [ballotpedia.org]
The four states where the deadline for inclusion on the primary ballot has not already passed have a total of 178 delegates combined, out of a total of 4,750 delegates. As such, if *anyone* attempted to file in those four states, the most delegates they could receive (assuming they *win* all the delegates in all four states) is 178+all 771 "superdelegates" (source: https://ballotpedia.org/Democratic_delegate_rules,_2020). [ballotpedia.org] Which would be absurd in the extreme.
But just for giggles let's posit that a candidate could sweep Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico and Oregon *and* get support from all 771 "superdelegates." That's a total of 949 delegates, or ~20% of the total delegates. Which wouldn't be nearly enough to get the nomination.
And, since sweeping all four states *and* getting *all* the superdelegates is an outcome so unlikely as to be absurd, there's no way that anyone could enter the campaign for Democratic presidential nominee at this late date and have *any* chance to succeed.
So. You're talking out of your ass and it smells that way too. Damn, that stinks!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 23 2020, @06:45AM (5 children)
To be fair to fustakrakich, I think what he is suggesting is that she might win a brokered deal in a contested convention. The big problem with that analysis is that Hillary lost to Trump in 2016; she has the putrid smell of loser all over her. I doubt there would be all that many delegates who want to see a repeat of 2016.
(Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Sunday February 23 2020, @07:58AM (4 children)
The DNC prefers Trump to Sanders. Hillary remains in the background. Bloomberg is handling it. All the arrangements have been made.
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 23 2020, @08:32AM (2 children)
"Bloomberg is handling it."
The last I saw of Bloomberg, he face-planted at the debate in Nevada. You're delusional.
(Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Sunday February 23 2020, @06:33PM (1 child)
Yes, yes, we all enjoy the theater... but, please... watch what happens at the convention. This act has been done before with great success. It already is a Trump/Bloomberg race with a lot of background noise from the cheap seats. One of those two will win.
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 23 2020, @09:24PM
OK, folks! You saw it here first! I'm sure it will be fun to force feed fustakrakich crow (or would that be buzzard?) come July. Right, guys?
(Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 23 2020, @05:46PM
Is it painful to talk out of your ass so much? Or are you just so used to it now that it doesn't bother you at all?