Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday August 29 2014, @08:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the but-not-with-an-uzi dept.

The accidental death of an instructor at an Arizona shooting range, killed while teaching a 9-year-old girl to fire a fully automatic Uzi, has touched off a debate among those who enjoy and teach the use of firearms: What’s the proper way to teach children about guns? The key, is training says gun instructor Butch Jensen. A gun is a tool, and like any tool — be it a circular saw or a kitchen knife — requires proper instruction. “It was clear that she was a beginner, and you don’t start a beginner in that type of firearm,” says Jensen, who watched a widely circulated video of the fatal lesson. “If you want to learn how to run Indy cars, you don’t start at Indy.” Blake Carrington, who serves in the Air Force, has taught his 10-year-old daughter to shoot a .22 rifle. “I personally would never give my child a fully automatic weapon,” says Carrington. “I feel terrible for that little girl having to live with that.”

Shooting instructors said in interviews that in some cases, a 9-year-old may be able to handle an Uzi, even though it has a tricky recoil and can fire hundreds of rounds per minute. The child would have to weigh enough to handle the recoil and have some experience with guns. The parent and instructor would have to jointly determine that the child is mature and skilled enough to operate the firearm safely. Tom, who practiced with an M1 Garand Rifle, says he shoots for sport and to exercise his 2nd Amendment rights. “I don’t think you should keep kids away from firearms. This shouldn’t keep people from taking their kids to the range.” Still, Tom says he could not fathom why adults allowed the 9-year-old girl to shoot an Uzi. “I don’t know what they were thinking. My personal opinion is someone under 15 years of age playing with a submachine weapon is not a good idea.”

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by dpp on Saturday August 30 2014, @07:24PM

    by dpp (3579) on Saturday August 30 2014, @07:24PM (#87635)

    Except when the "pick differently" endangers either/both the children or the people around them.
    IMHO - The parents of this 9yo girl recklessly endangered not only their daughter but others at the shooting range.

    Re: Why?
    The only conclusion I can come to, after watching the video, is it was a *thrill*/*kick* for the parents (probably your typical "gun nuts") to see their little girl firing an assault rifle.
    I come to that conclusion because they were their video taping her doing it.
    "Teaching her"? I doubt it - why teach your daughter to shoot a fully automatic assault rifle, otherwise illegal and she'd never be able to own/fire. Also, do you think if they were "teaching" her to use another possibly dangerous tool (as others here comment using for example), say a table saw or reciprocating saw - they'd be sitting back having someone show her how and video tape her?
    No, I think it was a sick ego-trip gone wrong. They've most likely damaged that girl for life, and recklessly caused the death of the man working at the range...all for their thrill/kicks of (most likely) readying a youtube video to show off their daughter and gun-nut fantasies.

    Re: "pick differently"?
    Parents can, in most cases, "pick differently" all they like, however not when it comes to recklessly endangering the child or others around them.