Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Saturday August 30 2014, @10:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the stranger-than-truth dept.

"An eighth-grade language arts teacher from Maryland has been placed on administrative leave after school officials learned he allegedly authored two books containing questionable content under a pseudonym.

Local network WBOC News reports that the investigation concerns two books published by McLaw under the nom de plume “Dr. K.S. Voltaer,” and one is about a fictional, futuristic school shooting that goes down in history as being the largest ever in the United States.

http://rt.com/usa/182964-teacher-leave-shooting-book/"

This is lunacy. School administrators are terrified there will be another Columbine or Sandy Hook and are overreacting, or are they. What could they do to prevent one. Nothing, nil, zero. No need to ask yourself 'why', say thank you to the traitorous NRA , the propaganda arm of the small arms manufacturing industry, for blocking any form of gun control. They have successfully infected the country with The American Disease™ almost unfettered access to weapons of war that kill with brutal efficiency. Sadly there appears to be no cure.

[EDITOR'S NOTE: The preceding paragraph was not up to our standards. The comments to this story are spot on. You expect better than this and we let you down. There are so many comments referring to this paragraph, we cannot just delete it, hence the strike-through. More to follow.]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Thexalon on Sunday August 31 2014, @01:54AM

    by Thexalon (636) on Sunday August 31 2014, @01:54AM (#87723)

    Even if guns are eliminated, people can still kill with swords and knifes. The elimination of guns only reduces a person's effective radius.

    Yes, and yes. And there's a decent argument that reducing someone's effective radius (and ability to kill through barriers) is a useful thing to be doing if you want to reduce the body count when somebody flips out and starts killing people.

    Yes, address the underlying causes that cause people to go on rampages. But if it were possible to completely eliminate guns, it's likely that somebody on a rampage would kill closer to 3-4 people rather than 25. For example, if somebody starts slashing a sword at a school, it's relatively easy for people to run away from them, put locked doors in between, or even grab a sturdy stick and push them away - it's not perfect, of course, but it reduces the damage quite a bit.

    --
    "Think of how stupid the average person is. Then realize half of 'em are stupider than that." - George Carlin
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by cafebabe on Sunday August 31 2014, @09:55AM

    by cafebabe (894) on Sunday August 31 2014, @09:55AM (#87801) Journal

    I agree with your figures. My concern is that we may optimize for one rare case (and ignore the underlying problems) while leaving people with greatly reduced defences in more common cases. It is premature optimization.

    --
    1702845791×2
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 01 2014, @10:09AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 01 2014, @10:09AM (#88058)

    knives/swords have a smaller radius then guns, true

    on the other hands guns are way louder and thus the use of gun will warn other nearby potential victims that danger is near, in a way a knife wont

    most of the articles about school knifings (mostly from china) I've seen have higher body counts then the mass shootings in the US