Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Dopefish on Saturday March 01 2014, @02:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the pass-go-and-collect-$200 dept.

buswolley writes:

"Is the United States or the EU really too poor to afford to build the things each needs to maintain prosperous nations? Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) posits that America is not too poor in real resources to do the things it needs to do, and now proponents of the theory have adapted the rules of the classic board game Monopoly to demonstrate their case. For those that do not know what modern monetary theory is about, a suitable primer on the topic might be Warren Mosler's Seven Deadly Innocent Frauds of Economy Policy or Diagrams and Dollars, either as a book on Amazon or on-line for free at NewEconomicsPerspectives.org.

While the Modern Monetary Theory perspective tends to elicit disbelief and even rage, I think it is important for any scientist and geek to weigh the evidence carefully, and by doing so understand better about how and why money is created and destroyed."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 17 2014, @11:39PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 17 2014, @11:39PM (#17840)

    I married libertarians to popular fiscal policy.
    Libertarians are fond of contracts.
    Advance a loan to each citizen with interest. Payment is due in 10,000 years. If you are of legal age you can sign and get the citizen loan. Winners will be productive. The others' demand push will provide the grit for each winner. Old growth forest is important, but the Forest dies without new saplings.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 23 2014, @11:29PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 23 2014, @11:29PM (#20009)

    I married libertarians to popular fiscal policy.
    Libertarians are fond of contracts.

    The contracts have, in contractarian philosophy, to be actually enforceable and plausible and to otherwise contain no invalidating terms.

    Advance a loan to each citizen with interest. Payment is due in 10,000 years. If you are of legal age you can sign and get the citizen loan. Winners will be productive. The others' demand push will provide the grit for each winner. Old growth forest is important, but the Forest dies without new saplings.

    I can't see any contractarian going for this. If you consider the debt to be a transferrable asset, which is typical, then you're still not avoiding theoretically plausible, crippling debt (or complete devaluation to the point of meaninglessness, through inflation). In regimes in which debts and assets get sorted out in probate planning, you're just applying some kind of penalty to the estate. And what about bankruptcies?

    Short answer, this is at best a meaningless helicopter drop of money with a veneer of respectability of no substantial value. Alternatively, the government is just buying perpetuities as a masked way of raising taxes.

    If I were in such a regime? I'd either assess it and find it to be insane, and ride that pony into the ground, or run screaming. I see no way of guaranteeing a balanced outcome.