Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday March 24 2020, @06:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the Safari?-Brave?-Opera? dept.

Software developer Drew DeVault has written a post at his blog about the reckless, infinite scope of today's web browsers. His conclusion is that, given decades of feature creep, it is now impossible to build a new web browser due to the obscene complexity of the web.

I conclude that it is impossible to build a new web browser. The complexity of the web is obscene. The creation of a new web browser would be comparable in effort to the Apollo program or the Manhattan project.

It is impossible to:

  • Implement the web correctly
  • Implement the web securely
  • Implement the web at all

Starting a bespoke browser engine with the intention of competing with Google or Mozilla is a fool's errand. The last serious attempt to make a new browser, Servo, has become one part incubator for Firefox refactoring, one part playground for bored Mozilla engineers to mess with technology no one wants, and zero parts viable modern web browser. But WebVR is cool, right? Right?

The consequences of this are obvious. Browsers are the most expensive piece of software a typical consumer computer runs. They're infamous for using all of your RAM, pinning CPU and I/O, draining your battery, etc. Web browsers are responsible for more than 8,000 CVEs.3

The browser duopoly of Firefox and Chrome/Chromium has clearly harmed the World-Wide Web. However, a closer look at the membership of the W3C committes also reveals representation by classic villains which, perhaps coincidentally, showed up around the time the problems noted by Drew began to grow.

Previously:
An Open Letter to Web Developers (2020)
Google Now Bans Some Linux Web Browsers from their Services (2019)
HTML is the Web (2019)
The Future of Browsers (2019)
One Year Since the W3C Sold Out the Web with EME (2018)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 24 2020, @04:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 24 2020, @04:26PM (#975070)

    Somewhat my sentiment, this.

    The need to implement everything exists only in the minds of people.

    Choose the subset of features (from 0 to everything), implement it, use it.
    Call it a browser or don't, if it has a function it will be used.
    Who cares what standard it follows, as long as its protocol level compatible and features can be removed.

    Following standards of people who can't program/don't like programming and would rather prefer fashion if anyone let them, is a terrible idea.
    OSI model... its an abstraction, it was somewhat useful sometime, but reality is a bit messy and its all bits anyway on the inside, so imo not a terrible loss, it has outlived its usefulness.

    Yea, http's fucked. Human nature wasn't accounted for in its design.
    Yup, profit. There was a reason Ixous threw the marketeers out of the Temple.
    If only someone would throw them out of the Internet too... :)