Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday April 02 2020, @08:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the writers-gotta-eat dept.

Authors fume as online library "lends" unlimited free books:

For almost a decade, the Internet Archive, an online library best known for its Internet Wayback Machine, has let users "borrow" scanned digital copies of books held in its warehouse. Until recently, users could only check out as many copies as the organization had physical copies. But last week, The Internet Archive announced it was eliminating that restriction, allowing an unlimited number of users to check out a book simultaneously. The Internet Archive calls this the National Emergency Library.

Initial media coverage of the service was strongly positive. The New Yorker declared it a "gift to readers everywhere." But as word of the new service spread, it triggered a backlash from authors and publishers.

"As a reminder, there is no author bailout, booksellers bailout, or publisher bailout," author Alexander Chee tweeted on Friday. "The Internet Archive's 'emergency' copyrights grab endangers many already in terrible danger."

"It is a tarted-up piracy site," wrote author James Gleick.

Previously:

Internet Archive Suspends E-Book Lending "Waiting Lists" During U.S. National Emergency


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday April 02 2020, @01:15PM (5 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 02 2020, @01:15PM (#978286) Journal

    What sort of 'author' would genuinely complain about people having access to books

    Welcome to conflict of interest. And hoist the black flag!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 02 2020, @05:06PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 02 2020, @05:06PM (#978371)

    You are being sarcastic with that pro-piracy statement yes?

    • (Score: 2, Touché) by khallow on Thursday April 02 2020, @05:11PM (3 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 02 2020, @05:11PM (#978375) Journal
      Nope. I'd rather have no copyright than the present regime of life plus eternity.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 02 2020, @07:30PM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 02 2020, @07:30PM (#978424)

        lol

        Capitalist apologist doesn't like copyright terms. Weird bit of hypocrisy you've got there, you must've grown up pirating games and other media.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday April 02 2020, @07:34PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 02 2020, @07:34PM (#978428) Journal

          Weird bit of hypocrisy

          What's hypocritical about my stance? We could choose to privatize the air you breathe, would that somehow be a good idea for a "capitalist apologist"?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 04 2020, @02:27PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 04 2020, @02:27PM (#979028)

          Copyright does not belong in the domain of capitalism. In fact, by stifling competition, it is actively acting against the ideals of capitalism.