Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday April 06 2020, @04:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-very-secure dept.

This fingerprint-verified smart lock can be foiled by a magnet:

Tapplock, a company that makes fingerprint-verified locks, has had a rough time with its locks' security. The company's flagship lock, which has been available since 2019, is apparently easy to pop open with a magnet. YouTuber LockPickingLawyer published a video last week showing how he could use a powerful magnet to turn the motor inside the Tapplock One Plus, causing it to open. The entire process takes less than 30 seconds.

The Tapplock One Plus costs $99 and features a fingerprint sensor. It also has built-in Bluetooth, so people can unlock it using an app. In response to the video, Tapplock commented: "Wow! Shout out to LPL for finding this exploit. Working on a fix with magnetic shielding, will be back."

This is a commendable reply, although it doesn't do much for people who already bought the lock. Most companies ignore bug reports or fail to fix the flaw. It at least seems like Tapplock wants to figure out how to prevent this kind of attack.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Monday April 06 2020, @08:27AM (5 children)

    by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 06 2020, @08:27AM (#979590) Journal

    There is a huge variety of materials that are inherently protected from manipulation by magnets.

    But motors use magnetic fields to work. And the summary explicitly mentions that the magnet turned the motor.

    Replacing the magnets in the motor by non-magnetic materials would render that motor non-functioning.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by driverless on Monday April 06 2020, @09:42AM (2 children)

    by driverless (4770) on Monday April 06 2020, @09:42AM (#979599)

    Replacing the magnets in the motor by non-magnetic materials would render that motor non-functioning.

    So it'd make the lock very, very secure. I don't see the problem, you just need to climb in the window instead.

    • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Monday April 06 2020, @12:01PM (1 child)

      by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 06 2020, @12:01PM (#979612) Journal

      That's not the problem of the lock maker.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
      • (Score: 2) by driverless on Monday April 06 2020, @12:15PM

        by driverless (4770) on Monday April 06 2020, @12:15PM (#979614)

        It would even pass a BS 7799 security audit because the window is outside the security perimeter and thus not an auditable object.

  • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Monday April 06 2020, @02:22PM

    by RS3 (6367) on Monday April 06 2020, @02:22PM (#979643)

    You probably know most of this, but for everyone reading:

    Seeing this last evening, my first thought was to make a motor with no iron pole pieces in the armature/rotor. The rotor is the thing that turns in a motor, and in this case drives the mechanism which unlocks the lock's shackle.

    Most small DC motors have an electromagnetic rotor, with "brushes" to get the electric current into the rotor's wire coils, and permanent-magnet stator, aka field.

    The rotor's iron (steel) pole pieces, around which the wire coils are wrapped, are attracted to the force of the external magnet that LPL used to pick the lock.

    Iron is used for pole pieces because it greatly improves magnetic efficiency and motor torque (output force), but it's not necessary. You could make the rotor out of plastic, with copper wire coils, and the plastic would not be attracted to the external lock-picker's magnets. The motor would be weaker, but it might still be good enough in this case.

  • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Monday April 06 2020, @06:55PM

    by RS3 (6367) on Monday April 06 2020, @06:55PM (#979738)

    Replacing the magnets in the motor by non-magnetic materials would render that motor non-functioning.

    I politely disagree. Please see my post lower in this discussion. Basically you can make a motor with just copper coils- no need for iron/steel. My idea is to replace the rotor steel with plastic (or anything physically strong but non-magnetic). Stator (field) can be permanent magnets.