Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday September 01 2014, @06:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-store-personal-photographs-on-an-internet-connected-device dept.

PapayaSF and AnonTechie write in with 2 stories which seem to be linked. The first is the leak of nude and personal photographs of celebrities, and the second is perhaps the flaw that allowed someone to access the photographs.

Stars Exposed in Massive Nude Photo Leak

Nude celebrities, bitcoins, and Apple: it's a story seemingly designed to stir up the entire internet. Scores of private photos of celebrities such as Jennifer Lawrence, Kate Upton, Selena Gomez, Ariana Grande, Kirsten Dunst, and Mary Elizabeth Winstead have been leaked (allegedly from Apple's iCloud), and posted on 4chan in exchange for bitcoins. A list of 100+ names has appeared, but pictures have not yet appeared for many names on the list (including Kate Bosworth, Kim Kardashian, Rihanna, and Kaley Cuoco). Victoria Justice claims the photos of her are fake. Twitter accounts are being shut down. The story is still developing, so grab your popcorn.

This could be the Apple iCloud flaw that led to celebrity photos being leaked.

An alleged breach in Apple’s iCloud service may be to blame for countless leaks of private celebrity photos this week.

On Monday, a Python script emerged on Github (which we’re not linking to as there is evidence a fix by Apple is not fully rolled out) that appears to have allowed malicious users to ‘brute force’ a target account’s password on Apple’s iCloud, thanks to a vulnerability in the Find my iPhone service. Brute force attacks are where a malicious user uses a script to repeatedly guess passwords to attempt to discover the correct one.

The vulnerability allegedly discovered in the Find my iPhone service appears to have allowed attackers to use this method to guess passwords repeatedly without any sort of lockout or alert to the target. Once the password has been eventually matched, the attacker can then use it to access other iCloud functions freely.

http://thenextweb.com/apple/2014/09/01/this-could-be-the-apple-icloud-flaw-that-led-to-celebrity-photos-being-leaked/

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/is-apples-icloud-safe-after-leak-of-jennifer-lawrence-and-other-celebrities-nude-photos-9703142.html

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by looorg on Monday September 01 2014, @07:14PM

    by looorg (578) on Monday September 01 2014, @07:14PM (#88171)

    I fail to see the point. You are already on the internet, you can see people fucking left right and center. Doing all the stuff you like, and some that you don't. All in 4k quality etc etc. What is so special about seeing some blurry cellphone celeb boob or cunt? I promise you that they look more or less the same as all the other boobs and cunts out there. Not much difference really. Sure the shape and size and stuff might alter slightly here and there. But it's not something amazing never before seen stuff.

    That said tho. Whyyyyyy do people keep doing this? It's not the first time celeb nudies leak online. If you don't know how technology works. Please don't use it.

    Also will Apple get sued now? For their apparently lacking security.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=3, Interesting=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by c0lo on Monday September 01 2014, @07:41PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 01 2014, @07:41PM (#88179) Journal

    If you don't know how technology works. Please don't use it.

    Huh? Really? You mean you really know how a magnetron works? Can you design one? If not, does it stop you to cook a healthier bacon [wikipedia.org] to perfection?

    Also will Apple get sued now? For their obvious lack of security.

    FTFY. And I hope so.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 4, Informative) by VLM on Monday September 01 2014, @07:45PM

      by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 01 2014, @07:45PM (#88181)

      You've thrown down the gauntlet with the bacon thing, and the ultimate way to cook bacon is on a wire rack in the oven for like 20 minutes at 400 or so. You have to keep a really close eye on it toward the end as the difference between undercooked and burned is like 120 seconds.

      I gave up on both the frying pan and the microwave for bacon once I mastered the oven technique.

      • (Score: 5, Funny) by c0lo on Monday September 01 2014, @08:23PM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 01 2014, @08:23PM (#88192) Journal

        I gave up on both the frying pan and the microwave for bacon once I mastered the oven technique.

        Next step - use an overclocked cryptocurrency rig to cook your bacon: at least you'll derive some secondary benefits and look nerdier.

        End notes:
        * you see, the 400K is not nearly enough for a crispy bacon. Hand over your nerd card if you use other temperature scale.
        * 20 min on my 3kW fan forced electric oven is a waste, no matter how perfectly the bacon cooks. I'd try an electron gun for a precise energy transfer, but the bremsstrahlung would kill me.

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
        • (Score: 3, Funny) by isostatic on Monday September 01 2014, @11:10PM

          by isostatic (365) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 01 2014, @11:10PM (#88240) Journal

          you see, the 400K is not nearly enough for a crispy bacon.

          True, but 640K should be enough for anyone

          • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 01 2014, @11:29PM

            by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 01 2014, @11:29PM (#88247) Journal

            True, but 640K should be enough for anyone

            Wolfram doesn't understand your query [wolframalpha.com].

            --
            https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 1) by looorg on Monday September 01 2014, @07:56PM

      by looorg (578) on Monday September 01 2014, @07:56PM (#88186)

      [quote]Huh? Really? You mean you really know how a magnetron works? Can you design one? If not, does it stop you to cook a healthier bacon to perfection?[/quote]

      I do admit that I do not know exactly how a magnetron works. But then I don't even own a microwave oven so I don't really care. I have a fairly good grasp tho about how the common technologies I use and operate on a daily basis work. Also I'm not a bacon fan.

      But if I was to take pictures of my crotch with my phone, for some unknown reason. You better be sure I know how that works and where it would be stored.

      Also. Looking at the list of hundreds of celebnames. Who are all these people? A handful or so of them at best came to mind. Guess the rest of them are just teenpopstars and such. I'm to old for this ...

      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday September 01 2014, @08:31PM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 01 2014, @08:31PM (#88193) Journal

        if I was to take pictures of my crotch with my phone [...] You better be sure I know how that works ...
        ...
        I'm to old for this ...

        What do you know how it works, your crotch? So... it does still work!? Congrats, young Padwan.
        (now... how does that saying go? You know, something with the lawn, but at this age I can't recall it that well)

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford