Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday April 15 2020, @08:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the the-sordid-art-of-deflection dept.

BBC: Coronavirus: US to halt funding to WHO, says Trump

US President Donald Trump has said he is going to halt funding to the World Health Organization (WHO) because it has "failed in its basic duty" in its response to the coronavirus outbreak.

[...] Mr Trump has been under fire for his own handling of the pandemic.

He has sought to deflect persistent criticism that he acted too slowly to stop the virus's spread by pointing to his decision in late January to place restrictions on travel from China.

[...] The US is the global health body's largest single funder and gave it more than $400m in 2019.

A decision on whether the US resumes funding will be made after the review, which Mr Trump said would last 60 to 90 days.

[...] China gave about $86m in 2018-19; UK gives most of any country apart from the US

[...] The organisation launched an appeal in March for $675m to help fight the pandemic and is reported to be planning a fresh appeal for at least $1bn.

Reuters: Trump halts World Health Organization funding amid coronavirus pandemic

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would halt funding to the World Health Organization over its handling of the coronavirus pandemic while his administration reviews its response to the global crisis.

Trump told a White House news conference the WHO had “failed in its basic duty and it must be held accountable.” He said the group had promoted China’s “disinformation” about the virus that likely led to a wider outbreak of the virus than otherwise would have occurred.

[...] The hold on funding was expected. Trump has been increasingly critical of the organization as the global health crisis has continued, and he has reacted angrily to criticism of his administration’s response.

[...] U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Tuesday it was “not the time” to reduce resources for the body.

“Now is the time for unity and for the international community to work together in solidarity to stop this virus and its shattering consequences,” he said.

American Medical Association President Dr. Patrice Harris called it “a dangerous step in the wrong direction that will not make defeating COVID-19 easier” and urged Trump to reconsider.

[...] The Republican president recently accused the WHO of being too lenient with China in the earliest days of the crisis, despite having himself praised China in January for its response and transparency.

Trump has made frequent use of scapegoats during his short political career. He often lashes out at the media, Democrats, or others when he feels attacked or under pressure.

The Guardian: Trump turns against WHO to mask his own stark failings on Covid-19 crisis

Donald Trump’s declared suspension of funding of the World Health Organisation in the midst of a pandemic is confirmation – if any were needed – that he is in search of scapegoats for his administration’s much delayed and chaotic response to the crisis.

The US is the WHO’s biggest donor, with funding over $400m a year in both assessed contributions (membership fees) and donations – though it is actually $200m in arrears. [pdf]

Theoretically the White House cannot block funding of international institutions mandated by Congress. But the administration has found ways around such constitutional hurdles on other issues – by simply failing to disburse funds or apply sanctions, for example.

The funding could be formally rescinded, but that would require Senate approval, or “reprogrammed” by being diverted to another purpose that the White House could argue is consistent with the will of Congress.

[...] The WHO director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, had to fly to Beijing to meet Xi Jinping on 29 January to negotiate entry and information sharing. A WHO team was allowed to visit Wuhan on 22 February. Tedros has been criticised for his flattery of Xi and the Chinese response, in the face of Beijing’s obstructionism and cover-up attempts. His defenders said that such diplomacy was the price for entry.

Trump did more than his own fair share of Xi flattery. On 24 January, the president tweeted “China has been working very hard to contain the coronavirus … The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency.”

The claim that the delay in the WHO acquiring samples crippled the international response is also false. Chinese scientists publicly released the genetic sequence of Covid-19 on 11 January.

[...] By early February the WHO was in a position to distribute a Covid-19 test worldwide, but the US government opted not to have it fast-tracked through approval. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) instead produced its own test at about the same time, but it was flawed and had to be recalled. US testing would be set back more than six weeks compared to the rest of the world.

While virtually no testing was under way in the US throughout February, Trump assumed the consequently low number of confirmed US cases meant that his country had somehow escaped. “The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA,” he boasted on 24 February, nearly a month after the WHO declaration of emergency. “We are in contact with everyone and all relevant countries. CDC & World Health [Organisation] have been working hard and very smart. Stock Market starting to look very good to me!”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday April 16 2020, @03:45AM (7 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 16 2020, @03:45AM (#983444) Homepage Journal

    No, the cost isn't why I hate it. I hate that they presume to have a say in our government. I hate that we fund an organization that doesn't have our interests at heart. Why doesn't Saudi Arabia fund the UN, instead of us? All of those oil-rich countries should be funding it. And, China. But, no, every time the UN wants something, they come to us, instead.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 16 2020, @04:02AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 16 2020, @04:02AM (#983449)

    I hate that they presume to have a say in our government.

    Yeah, how dare those beggars say something to the best government money can buy?
    Shirley, at such a price, our government have our interest at heart; must be so despite decades of the contrary.

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday April 16 2020, @04:12AM (1 child)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 16 2020, @04:12AM (#983454) Homepage Journal

      If I come knocking on your door, to ask for handouts, would that entitle me to tell you how to run your home?

      The UN is a piss-poor joke, coming to us asking for money, then pretending to be our equal or our superiors. Worse, the screw up everything they touch.

      --
      Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
      • (Score: 5, Insightful) by MostCynical on Thursday April 16 2020, @04:25AM

        by MostCynical (2589) on Thursday April 16 2020, @04:25AM (#983458) Journal

        more like: you pay a pest inspector, they tell you to move a wood pile because of termite risk..

        but you don't move the wood pile, and indeed, you make it bigger, then complain that the pest inspector didn't stop the termites,,,

        --
        "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Thursday April 16 2020, @01:33PM (3 children)

    by Thexalon (636) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 16 2020, @01:33PM (#983567)

    I hate that we fund an organization that doesn't have our interests at heart.

    The UN can't order office stationary without US approval, thanks to the US's veto power in the Security Council. So how can they not have US interests in mind?

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday April 16 2020, @03:57PM (2 children)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 16 2020, @03:57PM (#983644) Homepage Journal

      "In mind" and "at heart" aren't synonymous. Not even close.

      --
      Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
      • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Thursday April 16 2020, @05:06PM (1 child)

        by Thexalon (636) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 16 2020, @05:06PM (#983685)

        Ahh, so your problem with the UN is that it's organized so that they also have to answer to the 6 billion or so other humans who live outside of the US in any way whatsoever. Got it.

        --
        The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday April 16 2020, @07:00PM

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 16 2020, @07:00PM (#983733) Homepage Journal

          There is your mistake. The UN doesn't answer to six billion humans, in or out of the US. The UN panders to governments, some more than others. If the UN actually answered to billions of humans, I might possibly approve of the UN. In short, the UN is politics, and UN officials are political animals, no better than our own political animals here in the US.

          --
          Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.