SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
Archaeological evidence shows that the first brown hares and chickens to arrive in Britain were buried with care and intact. There is no signs of butchery on bones examined and the ongoing research suggests the two animals were not imported for people to eat.
Work by experts from the Universities of Exeter, Leicester and Oxford is revealing when brown hares, rabbits and chickens were introduced to Britain, and how they became incorporated into modern Easter traditions.
The team has previously analyzed the earliest rabbit bone to be found in the country, which dates to the first/second century AD. New radiocarbon dates for bones found on sites in Hampshire (Houghton Down, Weston Down, Winnal Down and Winklebury Camp) and Hertfordshire (Blackhorse Road) suggests brown hares and chickens were introduced to Britain even earlier, arriving simultaneously in the Iron Age, between the fifth and the third century BC.
The discovery of buried skeletons fits historical evidence that neither animal was eaten until the Roman period, which began hundreds of years later.
Julius Caesar's De Bello Gallico says: "The Britons consider it contrary to divine law to eat the hare, the chicken, or the goose. They raise these, however, for their own amusement and pleasure." The third-century AD author, Dio Cassius reported that Queen Boudicca released a live hare in order to divine the outcome of her battle with the Romans, calling upon the goddess Andraste to secure their victory.
During the Roman period, both species were farmed and eaten, and rabbits were also introduced. But in AD 410 the Roman Empire withdrew from Britain causing economic collapse. Rabbits became locally extinct, while populations of chickens and brown hares crashed. Due to their scarcity at this time, chickens and hares regained their special status.
(Score: 5, Interesting) by Dr Spin on Saturday April 18 2020, @09:27AM (4 children)
They still are often kept as pets and buried with ceremony in the UK.
Why do archeologists use religion to explain what they don't know?
Warning: Opening your mouth may invalidate your brain!
(Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2020, @11:33AM
>> Why do archeologists use religion to explain what they don't know?
The same reason AGW scientists use models to explain what they don't know.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2020, @12:04PM (1 child)
Plus we treat cats as gods as of now.
(Score: 3, Funny) by Runaway1956 on Saturday April 18 2020, @06:31PM
Cats were gods before the Egyptians were born. Without cats, there would have been no Egyptians - or Greeks, or Romans. People before the Egyptians must have been hard to convince, because the cats would come down from cat heaven wearing huge saber-toothed bodies, to punish the non-believers. I mean, how do you NOT believe in something with six inch (or longer) fangs? Even the most obtuse Neanderthal believed after an encounter with the big kitties.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2020, @11:56PM
I was once told by an actual archaeologist that calling something a 'religious artifact' is what you say when you have absolutely no idea what something is and don't want to be called on it.