Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Saturday April 18 2020, @08:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the hares-to-eating-chicken dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Archaeological evidence shows that the first brown hares and chickens to arrive in Britain were buried with care and intact. There is no signs of butchery on bones examined and the ongoing research suggests the two animals were not imported for people to eat.

Work by experts from the Universities of Exeter, Leicester and Oxford is revealing when brown hares, rabbits and chickens were introduced to Britain, and how they became incorporated into modern Easter traditions.

The team has previously analyzed the earliest rabbit bone to be found in the country, which dates to the first/second century AD. New radiocarbon dates for bones found on sites in Hampshire (Houghton Down, Weston Down, Winnal Down and Winklebury Camp) and Hertfordshire (Blackhorse Road) suggests brown hares and chickens were introduced to Britain even earlier, arriving simultaneously in the Iron Age, between the fifth and the third century BC.

The discovery of buried skeletons fits historical evidence that neither animal was eaten until the Roman period, which began hundreds of years later.

Julius Caesar's De Bello Gallico says: "The Britons consider it contrary to divine law to eat the hare, the chicken, or the goose. They raise these, however, for their own amusement and pleasure." The third-century AD author, Dio Cassius reported that Queen Boudicca released a live hare in order to divine the outcome of her battle with the Romans, calling upon the goddess Andraste to secure their victory.

During the Roman period, both species were farmed and eaten, and rabbits were also introduced. But in AD 410 the Roman Empire withdrew from Britain causing economic collapse. Rabbits became locally extinct, while populations of chickens and brown hares crashed. Due to their scarcity at this time, chickens and hares regained their special status.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by legont on Saturday April 18 2020, @04:37PM (2 children)

    by legont (4179) on Saturday April 18 2020, @04:37PM (#984591)

    How exactly? And where hares came from? (Yes, I tried wiki for a couple of minutes)

    --
    "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2020, @06:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2020, @06:33PM (#984630)

    Don't hares come from nostrils?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2020, @06:47PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2020, @06:47PM (#984634)

    Isn't this like asking where *any* species came from? Humans have the "out of Africa"
    theory. The Wiki article says hares are native to Eurasia, Africa and North America. All of
    these places were connected by land bridges or short portages that could have allowed
    ancient people to easily transport them, or for a pair to have found their way
    across a river or frozen sea. Perhaps South America and/or the tropical isthmus had too many predators for
    them to take hold. They are infamously not native to Australia, so we know Aborigines didn't bring them.

    Chickens? Same deal. We don't have real answers for most species; but based
    on the behavior of humans in recorded history, they were almost certainly brought
    by humans in many cases.