Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday April 29 2020, @05:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the its-dead-jim dept.

After prolonged service outage, Petnet shuts down, citing coronavirus:

Cloud-connected, "smart" automated pet-feeder system Petnet has had a rough spring. The service not only went offline in February, but all its customer service vanished, too, leaving users in the dark until the company apologized and pushed a patch more than a week later. The service briefly returned for some users but fell off again in March. Now, after weeks of silence, the company is blaming COVID-19 for driving it offline for good—even though its problems started weeks or months before the novel coronavirus became a significant concern.

[...] "Last week on April 14, 2020, we briefed all of our customers regarding one of our third-party connected vendor's inability to fully resource their company and stay functionally online," the message reads. "As of this writing, this situation remains unresolved but we are confident it will be overcome soon."

But due to the exceptional circumstances the COVID-19 pandemic has created, Petnet went on, many of its vendors—largely startups like itself—were "severely and negatively affected in their day to day operations." In short: the funding dried up. Due to a lack of funds, Petnet said, it "re-prioritized and reorganized [its] resources," including:

  • We have furloughed 100% of our remaining staff
  • We have ceased all future product development, including bug fixes
  • We have turned off all non-infrastructure related expenses
  • We have terminated our office lease and are working remotely
  • We have applied for all available CARES stimulus funding

(2020-02-28) Petnet's Smart Pet Feeder System Back after Week-Long Outage
(2016-07-30) Cats, Dogs Go Hungry as Internet-Connected PetNet Plays Dead

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 29 2020, @03:50PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 29 2020, @03:50PM (#988219)

    I fully agree, but how and where would that information be hosted (initially at least)?

    Without some government run organization or a non-profit involved there isn't manpower or money to rescue code and paper from failing companies.

    So the only real solution here is to legislate that all products are fully open before first sale. That doesn't leave a whole lot of room for competitive advantage.

  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday April 29 2020, @04:00PM (1 child)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 29 2020, @04:00PM (#988222) Journal

    Require it to be deposited with the Library of Congress at minimum, just as the company sinks beneath the waves.

    Why is it that when I hold a stick, everyone begins to look like a pinata?
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 29 2020, @06:55PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 29 2020, @06:55PM (#988294)

      GitHub would do nicley

      If you cease to support an IoT gadget for more that 30 days, the whole design has to be published and available for use by the abandoned equipment owners.

      I won't hold my breath.

      So given that they didn't do this, what's to stop a grass roots reverse engineering project for the h/w followed by an open source s/w project?

      How complicated is the h/w?