Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday May 01 2020, @11:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the resistance-is-futile.-/home-will-be-assimilated dept.

Good News:

Linux home directory management is about to undergo major change:

With systemd 245 comes systemd-homed. Along with that, Linux admins will have to change the way they manage users and users' home directories.

[...] Prior to systemd every system and resource was managed by its own tool, which was clumsy and inefficient. Now? Controlling and managing systems on Linux is incredibly easy.

But one of the creators, Leannart Poettering, has always considered systemd to be incomplete. With the upcoming release of systemd 245, Poettering will take his system one step closer to completion. That step is by way of homed.

[...] let's take a look at the /home directory. This is a crucial directory in the Linux filesystem hierarchy, as it contains all user data and configurations. For some admins, this directory is so important, it is often placed on a separate partition or drive than the operating system. By doing this, user data is safe, even if the operating system were to implode.

However, the way /home is handled within the operating system makes migrating the /home directory not nearly as easy as it should be. Why? With the current iteration of systemd, user information (such as ID, full name, home directory, and shell) is stored in /etc/passwd and the password associated with that user is stored in /etc/shadow. The /etc/passwd file can be viewed by anyone, whereas /etc/shadow can only be viewed by those with admin or sudo privileges.

[...] Poettering has decided to make a drastic change. That change is homed. With homed, all information will be placed in a cryptographically signed JSON record for each user. That record will contain all user information such as username, group membership, and password hashes.

Each user home directory will be linked as LUKS-encrypted containers, with the encryption directly coupled to user login. Once systemd-homed detects a user has logged in, the associated home directory is decrypted. Once that user logs out, the home directory is automatically encrypted.

[...] Of course, such a major change doesn't come without its share of caveats. In the case of systemd-homed, that caveat comes by way of SSH. If a systemd-homed home directory is encrypted until a user successfully logs in, how will users be able to log in to a remote machine with SSH?

The big problem with that is the .ssh directory (where SSH stores known_hosts and authorized_keys) would be inaccessible while the user's home directory is encrypted. Of course Poettering knows of this shortcoming. To date, all of the work done with systemd-homed has been with the standard authentication process. You can be sure that Poettering will come up with a solution that takes SSH into consideration.

Older articles:

Will systemd be considered complete once the kernel and boot loader have been absorbed into systemd?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by hendrikboom on Friday May 01 2020, @02:06PM (4 children)

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 01 2020, @02:06PM (#988954) Homepage Journal

    /home wasn't around in 1975. Back then my home directory was at /usr/hendrik.

    So it's beem around for less than the full 50 years.

    -- hendrik

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Informative=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 01 2020, @04:52PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 01 2020, @04:52PM (#989038)

    I had always wondered why it was called '/usr' but if it was both user binaries and home dirs that would make a lot of sense. Seems like things keep getting under-organized over and over until a restructure is in order, then they break the expectations of the old paradigm, at least in part.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 01 2020, @10:22PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 01 2020, @10:22PM (#989238)

      There was no /usr/bin originally. operating system binaries all went to /bin.

      The whole reason /usr/bin came into existence is because the system became too large to fit on the / disk, and there was no raid or dynamic resizing. Only after that were users moved to /home.

  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday May 01 2020, @08:07PM (1 child)

    by Bot (3902) on Friday May 01 2020, @08:07PM (#989163) Journal

    >So it's beem around...

    and here is when one of hendrik's fingers mangles accidentally with his looooong grey beard and mistypes.

    --
    Account abandoned.