Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the crime-doesn't-pay dept.

The Confessions of Marcus Hutchins, the Hacker Who Saved the Internet (archive)

At 22, he single-handedly put a stop to the worst cyberattack the world had ever seen. Then he was arrested by the FBI. This is his untold story.

[...] For the next few minutes, the agents struck a friendly tone, asking Hutchins about his education and Kryptos Logic, the security firm where he worked. For those minutes, Hutchins allowed himself to believe that perhaps the agents wanted only to learn more about his work on WannaCry, that this was just a particularly aggressive way to get his cooperation into their investigation of that world-shaking cyberattack. Then, 11 minutes into the interview, his interrogators asked him about a program called Kronos.

"Kronos," Hutchins said. "I know that name." And it began to dawn on him, with a sort of numbness, that he was not going home after all.

[...] Despite his sentence of time served, his legal case forced him to overstay his visa, and he's soon likely to be deported back to England. As we walk into Santa Monica, past rows of expensive beach homes, he says his goal is to eventually get back here to LA, which now feels more like home than Devon. "Someday I'd like to be able to live in a house by the ocean like this," he says, "Where I can look out the window and if the waves are good, go right out and surf."

A long, but interesting read.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:24PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:24PM (#994372)

    Trusting american "justice", what a fool.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @12:01AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @12:01AM (#994444)

      He also did a bunch of other crimes too. Just being a samaratain does not give you a pass to do other things.

  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:46PM (12 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:46PM (#994387)

    How do they introduce themselves at their place of worship, school, work, home, etc. when so many of them are named Mohamed?

    I can just imagine it:

    Mohamed: Ayyyyy, Mohamed my man, so good to see you. How are you?
    Mohamed: Great to see you again, Mohamed. I am well.
    Mohamed: Ayyyyy, Mohamed is here. Come, Mohamed, let's greet Mohamed!
    Mohamed: Hi, guys! I just bought a new box of masks!
    Mohamed: You're kidding! What until I tell Mohamed and Mohamed at work tomorrow.
    Mohamed: What HAVE you done to your car, Mohamed?
    Mohamed: Well, I actually washed it. I named it Mohamed.
    Mohamed: A wonderful choice. Whooops, my phone is ringing. Ayyy it's Mohamed from Taco Bell.
    Mohamed: What does he want?
    Mohamed: Hey, you didn't wash all of your car, Mohamed, I see a spot right here.
    Mohamed: GUYS! GUYS!
    Mohamed: What the.... Mohamed? Is that really you?
    Mohamed: YES! Still have that beater car, eh?
    Mohamed: HAHAHA
    Mohamed: My friends, I have created a new chat application. Now we can all join in together!

    Mohamed has entered the chat.
    Mohamed has entered the chat.
    Mohamed has entered the chat.
    Mohamed has entered the chat.
    Mohamed has entered the chat.
    Mohamed has entered the chat.
    Mohamed has entered the chat.

    • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:46PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:46PM (#994388)

      Ah, yes.... the mohammeds...

      POLICE BE UPON THEM!

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Arik on Thursday May 14 2020, @09:35PM (7 children)

      by Arik (4543) on Thursday May 14 2020, @09:35PM (#994401) Journal
      That's why you have ibn and abu names.

      You want to speak with Mohammed? Do you mean Mohammed Abu Mohammed? Mohammed Abu Ibrahim? Ibrahim Ibn Mohammed? Mohammed Abu Saif? Saif Ibn Mohammed? Perhaps Abdullah Mohammed Ibn Abdullah al-Faraj Ibn Salim?

      They may all be named Mohammed but it's not that hard to distinguish between them. How many people are named John Smith, or Jesus Garcia?
      --
      If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
      • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @09:44PM (5 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @09:44PM (#994405)

        The difference is John Smith doesn't think he's getting 72 virgins if he triggers a suicide vest next to you.

        • (Score: 3, Touché) by Arik on Thursday May 14 2020, @10:09PM (2 children)

          by Arik (4543) on Thursday May 14 2020, @10:09PM (#994417) Journal
          Wow, you're not just able to read minds, but you can read the minds of everyone with a particular name, all at once?
          --
          If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
          • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @10:46PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @10:46PM (#994426)

            GP has been assimilated into the Mohammed hive-mind! He's one of them! Aaaa!

          • (Score: 2) by Bot on Sunday May 17 2020, @12:08PM

            by Bot (3902) on Sunday May 17 2020, @12:08PM (#995315) Journal

            Not the most interesting discussion in the universe, but I can make pretty solid assumptions about german people who have been named Adolf in the past decades, so why shouldn't it work for Mohameds.

            --
            Account abandoned.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @02:12AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @02:12AM (#994483)

          The difference is John Smith doesn't think he's getting 72 virgins if he triggers a suicide vest next to you.

          Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @06:07AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @06:07AM (#994546)

            Better he's getting 72 followers on Twitter.

      • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @02:09AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @02:09AM (#994481)

        My text is formatted so beautifully. I am like a golden rose with the sweetest scent.

    • (Score: 2, Offtopic) by Gaaark on Friday May 15 2020, @01:58AM (2 children)

      by Gaaark (41) on Friday May 15 2020, @01:58AM (#994477) Journal

      Second Bruce: G'day, Bruce!

      First Bruce: Oh, Hello Bruce!

      Third Bruce: How are you Bruce?

      First Bruce: A bit crook, Bruce.

      Second Bruce: Where's Bruce?

      First Bruce: He's not 'ere, Bruce.

      Third Bruce: Blimey, it's hot in here, Bruce.

      First Bruce: Hot enough to boil a monkey's bum!

      Second Bruce: That's a strange expression, Bruce.

      First Bruce: Well Bruce, I heard the Prime Minister use it. 'It's hot enough to boil a monkey's bum in here, your Majesty,' he said and she smiled quietly to herself.

      Third Bruce: She's a good Sheila Bruce, and not at all stuck up.

      Second Bruce: Here! Here's the boss-fellow now! - how are you Bruce?

      (Enter fourth Bruce with English person, Michael)

      Fourth Bruce: 'Ow are you, Bruce?

      First Bruce: G'day Bruce!

      Fourth Bruce: Bruce.

      Second Bruce: Hello Bruce.

      Fourth Bruce: Bruce.

      Third Bruce: How are you, Bruce?

      Fourth Bruce: G'day Bruce.

      Fourth Bruce: Gentleman, I'd like to introduce man from Pommeyland who is joinin' us this year in the philosophy department at the University of Walamaloo.

      Everybruce: G'day!

      Michael: Hello.

      Fourth Bruce: Michael Baldwin, Bruce. Michael Baldwin, Bruce. Michael Baldwin, Bruce.

      First Bruce: Is your name not Bruce?

      Michael: No, it's Michael.

      Second Bruce: That's going to cause a little confusion.

      Third Bruce: Mind if we call you 'Bruce' to keep it clear?

      Fourth Bruce: Gentlemen, I think we better start the faculty meeting. Before we start, though, I'd like to ask the padre for a prayer.

      First Bruce: Oh Lord, we beseech Thee, Amen!!

      Everybruce: Amen!

      Fourth Bruce: Crack tubes! (Sound of cans opening) Now I call upon Bruce to officially welcome Mr. Baldwin to the philosophy faculty.

      Second Bruce: I'd like to welcome the pommey bastard to God's own Earth, and remind him that we don't like stuck-up sticky-beaks here.

      Everybruce: Hear, hear! Well spoken, Bruce!

      Fourth Bruce: Bruce here teaches classical philosophy, Bruce there teaches Haegelian philosophy, and Bruce here teaches logical positivism, and is also in charge of the sheep dip.

      Third Bruce: What's New-Bruce going to teach?

      Fourth Bruce: New-Bruce will be teaching political science, Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett, and Benet.

      Second Bruce: Those are all cricketers!

      Fourth Bruce: Aww, spit!

      Third Bruce: Hails of derisive laughter, Bruce!

      Everybruce: Australia, Australia, Australia, Australia, we love you amen!

      Fourth Bruce: Another tube! (Sound of cans opening) Any questions?

      Second Bruce: New-Bruce, are you a Poofta?

      Fourth Bruce: Are you a Poofta?

      Michael: No!

      Fourth Bruce: No. Right, I just want to remind you of the faculty rules: Rule One!

      Everybruce: No Pooftas!

      Fourth Bruce: Rule Two, no member of the faculty is to maltreat the Abbos in any way at all -- if there's anybody watching...... Rule Three?

      Everybruce: No Pooftas!!

      Fourth Bruce: Rule Four, now this term, I don't want to catch anybody not drinking..... Rule Five,

      Everybruce: No Pooftas!

      Fourth Bruce: Rule Six, there is NO ... Rule Six!... Rule Seven,

      Everybruce: No Pooftas!!

      Fourth Bruce: Right, that concludes the readin' of the rules, Bruce.

      First Bruce: This here's the wattle, the emblem of our land. You can stick it in a bottle, you can hold it in your hand.

      Everybruce: Amen!

      (NB: The Album versions continue with the Philosopher's song The TV version continues below....)

      First Bruce: Right, let's get some Sheilas.

      (An Aborigine bunts in with an enormous tray full of enormous steaks.)

      Fourth Bruce: OK.

      Second Bruce: Ah, elevenses.

      Third Bruce: This should tide us over 'til lunchtime.

      Second Bruce: Reckon so, Bruce.

      First Bruce: Sydney Nolan! What's that! (points)

      (Cut to dramatic close-up of Fourth Bruce's ear. Hold close-up. The superimposed arrow pointing to the ear.)

      Voice Over: Number nine. The ear.

      *****Album Version Continued******

      (And now all four Bruces launch into the Philosopher's song)

      Immanuel Kant was a real piss-ant who was very rarely stable.
      Heideggar, Heideggar was a boozy beggar who could think you under the table.
      David Hume could out-consume Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel.
      And Whittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as sloshed as Schlegel.
      There's nothing Nieizsche couldn't teach 'ya 'bout the raising of the wrist.
      Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed.
      John Stewart Mill, of his own free will, after half a pint of shanty was particularly ill.
      Plato, they say, could stick it away, half a crate of whiskey every day!
      Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle,
      And Hobbes was fond of his Dram.
      And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart: 'I drink, therefore I am.'
      Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
      A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:50PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @08:50PM (#994390)

    Isn't it weird how we still don't really know who wrote WannaCry (beyond briefly trying to pin it on North Korea), but this guy who authored other pieces of malware managed to figure out this one's incredibly stupid 'off switch', which was buying a domain name?

    No? Okay.

    • (Score: 5, Funny) by DannyB on Thursday May 14 2020, @09:31PM (3 children)

      by DannyB (5839) on Thursday May 14 2020, @09:31PM (#994399) Journal

      They could tell us who wrote it, but then they'd have to kill us.

      --
      If you eat an entire cake without cutting it, you technically only had one piece.
      • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by Ethanol-fueled on Thursday May 14 2020, @10:08PM (2 children)

        by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Thursday May 14 2020, @10:08PM (#994416) Homepage

        " As we walk into Santa Monica, past rows of expensive beach homes, he says his goal is to eventually get back here to LA "

        This fucker deserves whatever he gets. People who enjoy L.A. are a special combination of crazy and stupid.

        • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bzipitidoo on Friday May 15 2020, @04:29AM (1 child)

          by bzipitidoo (4388) on Friday May 15 2020, @04:29AM (#994525) Journal

          Hell, the normies have always been suspicious of hackers. The question ain't whether he's on our side, the question is, are we all on the same side? No discrimination? Not against anyone, including hackers and smarty pants?

          That paranoid, conspiracy suspecting thinking can too easily be self-fulfilling. It's often a load of bull anyway, motivated by jealousy, spite, and the desire to bring the hacker down to everyone else's level, not genuine cause to believe he might be a traitor. Treat smart people badly, and they just might flip, like Benedict Arnold did. He was a great military leader, but his superior officers kept screwing him over, out of jealousy and fear of losing their positions to him. The revolutionaries were fighting for freedom and their lives, but somehow these officers still made room for dirty politicking.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @01:59PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @01:59PM (#994617)

            It's /especially/ when they should be united that people are the most opportunistic. Why? You can sell people on crazy ideas that would never fly when ”you're all in it together." The whole situation is literally just giving opportunity to opportunists.

  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @09:20PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 14 2020, @09:20PM (#994397)


    Homosexual behavior in animals is sexual behavior among non-human species that is interpreted as homosexual or bisexual. This may include same-sex sexual activity, courtship, affection, pair bonding, and parenting among same-sex animal pairs.[1][2][3] Various forms of this are found in every major geographic region and every major animal group. The sexual behavior of non-human animals takes many different forms, even within the same species, though homosexual behavior is best known from social species.

    Scientists perceive homosexual behavior in animals to different degrees. The motivations for and implications of these behaviors have yet to be fully understood. According to Bruce Bagemihl, the animal kingdom engages in homosexual behavior "with much greater sexual diversity – including homosexual, bisexual and nonreproductive sex – than the scientific community and society at large have previously been willing to accept."[4] Bagemihl adds, however, that this is "necessarily an account of human interpretations of these phenomena".[5] Simon LeVay stated that "[a]lthough homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity."[6] One species in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[7][8] "About 10% of rams (males), refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams."[8]

    According to Bagemihl (1999), same-sex behavior (comprising courtship, sexual, pair-bonding, and parental activities) has been documented in over 450 species of animals worldwide.[9]

    In relation to humans
    Applying the term homosexual to animals

    The term homosexual was coined by Karl-Maria Kertbeny in 1868 to describe same-sex sexual attraction and sexual behavior in humans.[10] Its use in animal studies has been controversial for two main reasons: animal sexuality and motivating factors have been and remain poorly understood, and the term has strong cultural implications in western society that are irrelevant for species other than humans.[11] Thus homosexual behavior has been given a number of terms over the years. According to Bruce Bagemihl, when describing animals, the term homosexual is preferred over gay, lesbian, and other terms currently in use, as these are seen as even more bound to human homosexuality.[12]

    Bailey et al. says: "Homosexual: in animals, this has been used to refer to same-sex behavior that is not sexual in character (e.g. ‘homosexual tandem running’ in termites), same-sex courtship or copulatory behavior occurring over a short period of time (e.g. ‘homosexual mounting’ in cockroaches and rams) or long-term pair bonds between same-sex partners that might involve any combination of courting, copulating, parenting and affectional behaviors (e.g. ‘homosexual pair bonds’ in gulls). In humans, the term is used to describe individual sexual behaviors as well as long-term relationships, but in some usages connotes a gay or lesbian social identity. Scientific writing would benefit from reserving this anthropomorphic term for humans and not using it to describe behavior in other animals, because of its deeply rooted context in human society".[3]

    Animal preference and motivation is always inferred from behavior. In wild animals, researchers will as a rule not be able to map the entire life of an individual, and must infer from frequency of single observations of behavior. The correct usage of the term homosexual is that an animal exhibits homosexual behavior or even same-sex sexual behavior; however, this article conforms to the usage by modern research,[12][13][14][15][16] applying the term homosexuality to all sexual behavior (copulation, genital stimulation, mating games and sexual display behavior) between animals of the same sex. In most instances, it is presumed that the homosexual behavior is but part of the animal's overall sexual behavioral repertoire, making the animal "bisexual" rather than "homosexual" as the terms are commonly understood in humans.[15], but cases of homosexual preference and exclusive homosexual pairs are known.[17]
    Nature

    The observation of homosexual behavior in animals can be seen as both an argument for and against the acceptance of homosexuality in humans, and has been used especially against the claim that it is a peccatum contra naturam ("sin against nature"). For instance, homosexuality in animals was cited by the American Psychiatric Association and other groups in their amici curiae brief to the United States Supreme Court in Lawrence v. Texas, which ultimately struck down the sodomy laws of 14 states.[18][19]
    Research

    A majority of the research available concerning homosexual behavior in animals lacks specification between animals that exclusively exhibit same-sex tendencies and those that participate in heterosexual and homosexual mating activities interchangeably. This lack of distinction has led to differing opinions and conflicting interpretations of collected data amongst scientists and researchers. For instance, Bruce Bagemihl, author of the book Biological Exuberence: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity, emphasizes that there are no anatomical or endocrinological differences between exclusively homosexual and exclusively heterosexual animal pairs.[20] However, if the definition of "homosexual behavior" is made to include animals that participate in both same-sex and opposite-sex mating activities, hormonal differences have been documented among key sex hormones, such as testosterone and estradiol, when compared to those who participate solely in heterosexual mating.[21]

    Many of the animals used in laboratory-based studies of homosexuality do not appear to spontaneously exhibit these tendencies often in the wild. Such behavior is often elicited and exaggerated by the researcher during experimentation through the destruction of a portion of brain tissue, or by exposing the animal to high levels of steroid hormones prenatally.[22] Information gathered from these studies is limited when applied to spontaneously occurring same-sex behavior in animals outside of the laboratory.[22]

    Homosexual behaviour in animals has been discussed since classical antiquity. The earliest written mention of animal homosexuality appears to date back to 2,300 years ago, when Aristotle (384–322 BC) described copulation between pigeons, partridges and quails of the same sex.[23] The Hieroglyphics of Horapollo, written in the 4th century AD by the Egyptian writer Horapollo, mentions "hermaphroditism" in hyenas and homosexuality in partridges.[23] The first review of animal homosexuality was written by the zoologist Ferdinand Karsch-Haack in 1900.[23]

    Until recent times, the presence of same-sex sexual behavior was not "officially" observed on a large scale, possibly due to observer bias caused by social attitudes to same-sex sexual behavior,[24] innocent confusion, lack of interest, distaste, scientists fearing loss of their grants or even from a fear of "being ridiculed by their colleagues".[25][26] Georgetown University biologist Janet Mann states "Scientists who study the topic are often accused of trying to forward an agenda, and their work can come under greater scrutiny than that of their colleagues who study other topics."[27] They also noted "Not every sexual act has a reproductive function ... that's true of humans and non-humans."[27] It appears to be widespread amongst social birds and mammals, particularly the sea mammals and the primates. The true extent of homosexuality in animals is not known. While studies have demonstrated homosexual behavior in a number of species, Petter Bøckman, the scientific advisor of the exhibition Against Nature? in 2007, speculated that the true extent of the phenomenon may be much larger than was then recognized:

            No species has been found in which homosexual behaviour has not been shown to exist, with the exception of species that never have sex at all, such as sea urchins and aphis. Moreover, a part of the animal kingdom is hermaphroditic, truly bisexual. For them, homosexuality is not an issue.[25]

    Two male giraffes in Kenya.

    An example of overlooking homosexual behavior is noted by Bagemihl describing mating giraffes where nine out of ten pairings occur between males:

            Every male that sniffed a female was reported as sex, while anal intercourse with orgasm between males was only "revolving around" dominance, competition or greetings.[28]

    Some researchers believe this behavior to have its origin in male social organization and social dominance, similar to the dominance traits shown in prison sexuality. Others, particularly Bagemihl, Joan Roughgarden, Thierry Lodé[29] and Paul Vasey suggest the social function of sex (both homosexual and heterosexual) is not necessarily connected to dominance, but serves to strengthen alliances and social ties within a flock. Others have argued that social organization theory is inadequate because it cannot account for some homosexual behaviors, for example, penguin species where male individuals mate for life and refuse to pair with females when given the chance.[30][31] While reports on many such mating scenarios are still only anecdotal, a growing body of scientific work confirms that permanent homosexuality occurs not only in species with permanent pair bonds,[16] but also in non-monogamous species like sheep.

    One report on sheep cited below states:

            Approximately 8% of rams exhibit sexual preferences [that is, even when given a choice] for male partners (male-oriented rams) in contrast to most rams, which prefer female partners (female-oriented rams). We identified a cell group within the medial preoptic area/anterior hypothalamus of age-matched adult sheep that was significantly larger in adult rams than in ewes...[32]

    In fact, apparent homosexual individuals are known from all of the traditional domestic species, from sheep, cattle and horses to cats, dogs and budgerigars.[33]
    Basis

    Homosexual behavior in animals
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Snotnose on Friday May 15 2020, @01:28AM (5 children)

    by Snotnose (1623) on Friday May 15 2020, @01:28AM (#994464)

    Which was in the 70s. Never talk to a cop without a lawyer. There was a youtube video of a lawyer showing how the most innocuous things could be Bad For You (tm), it's been a few years and I can't find them now.

    Basically, if the cop decides to arrest you then you get to spend time in jail and $$$ on lawyers. You will never get that money back. The cop will never spend a dime. Plus your arrest is public record, the cop's record is sealed in HR.

    Being a law abiding citizen I find that hard to follow, but I got burned some 30 years ago so I follow it. I don't talk to cops. Period.

    I hate to say it, but if you're sitting at Jack In The Box and see a T-Bone crash then you might be OK talking to a cop. But I'm old, seen enough, and I would just "um, look at the cameras sir".

    --
    I came. I saw. I forgot why I came.
    • (Score: 4, Informative) by epitaxial on Friday May 15 2020, @02:21AM (1 child)

      by epitaxial (3165) on Friday May 15 2020, @02:21AM (#994485)

      The FBI does things a little differently. They ask you questions they already know the answers to. Keep that in mind.

      • (Score: 0, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @06:12AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @06:12AM (#994549)

        The DoJ does thing differently again. They get the FBI's evidence and the President dangles a pardon and everyone goes free.

    • (Score: 4, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @12:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @12:52PM (#994596)

      Here's what you were looking for: Don't Talk to the Police [youtube.com]

    • (Score: 2) by Common Joe on Saturday May 16 2020, @09:41AM (1 child)

      by Common Joe (33) <{common.joe.0101} {at} {gmail.com}> on Saturday May 16 2020, @09:41AM (#994935) Journal

      Until someone close to you and love goes missing. Then you get to decide: do I talk to the cops and risk jail or do I talk to the cops, and hope I help them find my loved one?

      I wish it were always so clear cut.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2020, @04:35PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2020, @04:35PM (#995033)

        You'll probably have to say something, but you should keep it simple lest you become the prime suspect in a murder investigation.

  • (Score: 4, Touché) by fishybell on Friday May 15 2020, @02:02AM (5 children)

    by fishybell (3156) on Friday May 15 2020, @02:02AM (#994478)

    Interesting tale of caution to say the least.

    Did he do wrong? Yes. Did he do right? Yes.

    Was his biggest mistake giving out personal details online? Probably.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by EJ on Friday May 15 2020, @02:29AM (4 children)

      by EJ (2452) on Friday May 15 2020, @02:29AM (#994489)

      No. His biggest mistake was doing wrong.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @04:34AM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @04:34AM (#994526)

        Let no good deed go unpunished.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @10:47AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @10:47AM (#994574)

          Let no good deed go unpunished.

          Let's put it this way. If he didn't do the "good things", he would still in the in "pound in the ass" federal prison and looking at another 5 or 10.

          Doing a good thing doesn't make the bad go away. You have to be right kind of criminal for the law to ignore you (see well connected criminals in law enforcement, justice system, politics, big banks, etc.). If you are some loser on drugs, then you just have to throw yourself on the mercy of the courts and pray that no one important has a grudge against you.

          • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @02:37PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 15 2020, @02:37PM (#994630)

            The more you can spend on your lawyer, the less problems you have. 1000$ is sufficient for most misdemeanors. 10000 can make a few years into 20 days.

        • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Friday May 15 2020, @01:16PM

          by Freeman (732) on Friday May 15 2020, @01:16PM (#994603) Journal

          While it may seem like that, the truth of the matter is he did some pretty shady things, which likely ended up with regular people losing lots of money. Probably the best thing he did was not tell the FBI a blatant lie. Then, he listened to his lawyer and threw himself on the mercy of the court. Since, he was guilty and the FBI had evidence that said he was. He may have, eventually been caught for the things he had done, but being in the spotlight, really pulls out the dirty laundry. Still, seems to me like he has gone legit and he got the best possible outcome that he could have hoped for. He didn't even spend that much time in jail as someone bailed him out.

          --
          Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2020, @06:18PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2020, @06:18PM (#995088)

    Kill the Pigs! Spill their blood!

(1)