Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by Runaway1956

Intelsat, launcher of 1st commercial communications satellite, files for bankruptcy… it’s a friend we didn’t know we had

By Andrew Dickens, a London-based freelance writer

Born in the Cold War, powered by rivalry and unhindered by free-market restrictions, Intelsat linked the planet with its satellites – but hardly anyone knew about it. Now, it struggles to stay afloat.
Anyone who remembers television in the late 20th century will remember the thrill of watching international broadcasts. The grainy pictures of faraway and foreign places, with their strange road signs, adverts and people. The sound delayed and crackled like a long-distance phone call.

Now we live in an age where a crystal-clear conversation with multiple people on multiple continents using a device lighter than a deck of cards is as commonplace as sliced bread, it’s easy to forget how powerful that early magic felt.

It’s even easier to forget the organization that launched the world’s first commercial communications satellite (Intelsat 1) in 1965, bringing many of us those miraculous early broadcasts that changed history and propelled us to the connected world, because we probably never knew its name. Now its prospects are less certain.

Intelsat filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Wednesday. The move is a part of restructuring process to help the company cut millions of dollars in debt and free resources for fresh projects.

This vast entity was born from the Cold War, having been instigated by John F Kennedy in 1961 as part of the space and technology races with the USSR. It was a satellite network that aimed to be a more expensive but also more reliable rival to the Soviet Molniya (Lightning) satellites.

It wasn’t a purely American venture, either. This was a different US to the current one. It was capitalist, no doubt, but a less voracious strain that didn’t view public spending as ‘socialism’ –especially when it came to besting the Russians, who had their own network with other Eastern Bloc countries.

So, the US government pumped money into satellites that weren’t available to the highest bidders, but rather to its strategic allies. Intelsat was an intergovernmental consortium, beginning with seven partners in 1964. Founding members included the UK, Canada and Spain. Within ten years it had had over 80 signatories.

Although he didn’t live to see the formal creation of Intelsat, what Kennedy started thrived for decades, bringing live pictures of major news and sport events from around the world to the world. It made the planet smaller, and made us all more a little more cosmopolitan.

In filing for bankruptcy, the company cited the Covid-19 pandemic, but that’s not what did the damage. Intelsat was hit by a ‘triple threat.’ First, the ruthless neoliberal economics that came to the fore in the 1980s and abhorred the unprofitable.

This was followed by the end of the Cold War (or that version, at least). Not that the US didn’t still have enemies, but the Big One had gone, which made it hard to justify the public money that went into it. So, in 2001, it was privatized, with shares being distributed among partners according to their use of the service. Four years later, it was sold to four private equity firms.

https://www.rt.com/news/488856-intelsat-satellite-bankruptcy-friend/

Intelsat will mean little if anything to the younger generations. For some of us, it's an opportunity for some nostalgia.

27 minute video on the the first launch - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKH-GijnAGk

A pop song on the subject - best listened to sitting inside a 1955 DeSoto - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryrEPzsx1gQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2vXbVERdrk

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Article Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2020, @06:10PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2020, @06:10PM (#995083)

    Did you put your savings into their stock and they just closed shop like "writing is on the wall boys, shut it down!"?

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday May 16 2020, @06:35PM

    by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Saturday May 16 2020, @06:35PM (#995095) Journal
    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 19 2020, @01:20AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 19 2020, @01:20AM (#996118)

    Scumsucking lime lizards!

  • (Score: 2) by lizardloop on Tuesday May 19 2020, @11:44AM

    by lizardloop (4716) on Tuesday May 19 2020, @11:44AM (#996284) Journal

    I nearly ended up running their conference call platform. They were renting a dedicated server for conference calls (back before everyone used Zoom or Teams) from a company that I nearly bought. I'm kind of glad we didn't end up buying them. I imagine most of their customers who were paying small fortunes for these bespoke conference call systems are just using off the shelf stuff.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 19 2020, @08:54PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 19 2020, @08:54PM (#996540)

    Racist conservative starts reading Russia Times, I guess you bonded with them as the oligarchs turned the place into a capitalist criminal enterprise, and let's not forget your personal bonding over their rather excessive homophobia. I'm still shocked you admitted to being a homophobe, guess your racism is still in the closet though, probably a lite winter sweater you don for stories of black men being murdered.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2020, @11:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2020, @11:52PM (#999021)

      How does your mind even work? Never mind - it doesn't.

(1)