Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday July 03 2020, @10:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the friend-of-a-friend dept.

More than 75% of all vulnerabilities reside in indirect dependencies:

The vast majority of security vulnerabilities in open-source projects reside in indirect dependencies rather than directly and first-hand loaded components.

"Aggregating the numbers from all ecosystems, we found more than three times as many vulnerabilities in indirect dependencies than we did direct dependencies," Alyssa Miller, Application Security Advocate at Snyk, told ZDNet in an interview discussing Snyk's State of Open Source Security for 2020 study.

The report looked at how vulnerabilities impacted the JavaScript (npm), Ruby (RubyGems), Java (MavenCentral), PHP (Packagist), and Python (PyPI) ecosystems.

Snyk said that 86% of the JavaScript security bugs, 81% of the Ruby bugs, and 74% of the Java ones impacted libraries that were dependencies of the primary components loaded inside a project.

[...] Snyk argues that companies scanning their primary dependencies for security issues without exploring their full dependency tree multiple levels down would release or end up running products that were vulnerable to unforeseen bugs.

So dear Soylentils, how do you track vulnerabilities in libraries that you use in your projects and do you scan beyond direct dependencies?

Previously:
(2020-05-16) Nine in Ten Biz Applications Harbor Out-of-Date, Unsupported, Insecure Open-Source Code, Study Shows


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by zoward on Friday July 03 2020, @03:56PM (1 child)

    by zoward (4734) on Friday July 03 2020, @03:56PM (#1015776)

    These are all good points. I wonder how many actual infections are due to out of date libraries vs. up-to-date with regression bugs?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by TheRaven on Friday July 03 2020, @09:18PM

    by TheRaven (270) on Friday July 03 2020, @09:18PM (#1015859) Journal
    Vulnerabilities are typically due to out-of-date libraries. Other kinds of bugs are more common as a result of updating but not testing the library. There was a paper at EuroS&P this year that did an analysis of upgrading the libraries bundled with a load of popular Android apps to the latest version that claimed to be backwards compatible with the version that they shipped. Something ludicrous like 30% of them actually worked (i.e. didn't crash in a tiny bit of automated UI testing) after the upgrade.
    --
    sudo mod me up