Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Friday September 12 2014, @12:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the guilt-by-friend-of-a-friend dept.

Jeffrey Mervis reports at Science AAAS that in 1979 Valerie Barr handed out leaflets, stood behind tables at rallies, and baked cookies to support two left-wing groups, the Women’s Committee Against Genocide and the New Movement in Solidarity with Puerto Rican Independence. In August 2013 she took a leave from her position as tenured professor of computer science at Union College to join the National Science Foundation (NSF) as a program director in its Division of Undergraduate Education. And that’s when her 3-decade-old foray into political activism came back to haunt her. Federal investigators say that Barr lied during a routine background check about her affiliations with a domestic terrorist group that had ties to the two organizations to which she had belonged in the early 1980s. On 27 August, NSF said that her “dishonest conduct” compelled them to cancel her temporary assignment immediately, at the end of the first of what was expected to be a 2-year stint. Federal investigators say those groups were affiliated with a third, the May 19 Communist Organization (M19CO), that carried out a string of violent acts, including the killing of two police officers and a security guard during a failed 1981 robbery of a Brink’s truck near Nyack, New York.

Barr’s first background interview was held in November 2013, 3 months after she began working at NSF. During that session, Barr answered “no” when asked if she had ever been a member of an organization “dedicated to the use of violence” to overthrow the U.S. government or to prevent others from exercising their constitutional rights. In a second interview after again being asked if she had been a member of any organization that espoused violence, Barr was grilled for 4.5 hours about her knowledge of all three organizations and several individuals with ties to them, including the persons who tried to rob the Brink’s truck. Four people were found guilty of murder in that attack and sentenced to lengthy prison terms, including Kathy Boudin, who was released in 2003 and is now an adjunct assistant professor of social work at Columbia University. “I found out about the Brink’s robbery by hearing it on the news, and just like everybody else I was shocked,” she recalls.

Barr says she is thankful that Union College has welcomed her back with open arms and says she will soon resume her teaching and research activities. In addition, she regards her year at NSF as “a very rewarding experience in many ways.” Even so, she has written to her representatives in Congress and to NSF Director France Córdova asking them to examine what she labels an “Orwellian process” for vetting rotators like herself. “We volunteer to do this,” she wrote Córdova on 29 August. Until a better process is put in place, Barr says, “NSF runs the risk that many highly qualified scientists will not even consider serving as IPAs. That will be a tremendous loss.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by resignator on Friday September 12 2014, @02:04PM

    by resignator (3126) on Friday September 12 2014, @02:04PM (#92396)

    Did you even read the summary before posting? By these same standards, every Christian, Catholic, and Muslim is guilty of belonging to a "violent group".

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 12 2014, @04:12PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 12 2014, @04:12PM (#92458)

    every Christian, Catholic, and Muslim

    So I get you don't consider Catholics to be Christians?

    • (Score: 1) by arashi no garou on Friday September 12 2014, @04:22PM

      by arashi no garou (2796) on Friday September 12 2014, @04:22PM (#92465)

      Some Protestants (particularly in the Southeastern US) don't, believe it or not. Personally I lump them together with Judaism under the tag "Abrahamic".

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 12 2014, @04:37PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 12 2014, @04:37PM (#92480)

      > So I get you don't consider Catholics to be Christians?

      A majority of Christian evangelicals do not consider Catholics to be Christian. It has something to do with the pope and the church being a sort of false god in and of itself because Catholics believe you need the church to intercede with god and protestants think you should talk to god directly. Ironically the catholic church does not exclude evangelicals from their definition of Christianity, they even go so far as to accept evangelical baptisms as equal to catholic baptisms for getting into heaven or whatever it is they care about. Maybe it isn't so ironic though given that the dictionary definition of catholic is all-embracing and universalist.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 12 2014, @11:46PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 12 2014, @11:46PM (#92618)

        Ironically the catholic church does not exclude evangelicals from their definition of Christianity,...

        Theoretically, no. Practically, they pretty much do. I believe that the term they technically use is that protestants are in "impaired communion" with the Roman Catholic Church (i.e., the real Christian Church). For practical purposes, this usually means that many (most?) Roman Catholics view protestants as being outside the saving grace of the(ir) church because they believe that grace is received through the sacraments administered by the priests in the Catholic Church, which protestants can't officially partake of.

        ...they even go so far as to accept evangelical baptisms as equal to catholic baptisms for getting into heaven or whatever it is they care about.

        I need a citation for this. Really? Are you serious? I could possibly see the Roman Catholics accepting baptism in the Anglican or (possibly) Episcopal churches. But Presbyterian? Baptists? Methodists? No way!