Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Friday September 12 2014, @12:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the guilt-by-friend-of-a-friend dept.

Jeffrey Mervis reports at Science AAAS that in 1979 Valerie Barr handed out leaflets, stood behind tables at rallies, and baked cookies to support two left-wing groups, the Women’s Committee Against Genocide and the New Movement in Solidarity with Puerto Rican Independence. In August 2013 she took a leave from her position as tenured professor of computer science at Union College to join the National Science Foundation (NSF) as a program director in its Division of Undergraduate Education. And that’s when her 3-decade-old foray into political activism came back to haunt her. Federal investigators say that Barr lied during a routine background check about her affiliations with a domestic terrorist group that had ties to the two organizations to which she had belonged in the early 1980s. On 27 August, NSF said that her “dishonest conduct” compelled them to cancel her temporary assignment immediately, at the end of the first of what was expected to be a 2-year stint. Federal investigators say those groups were affiliated with a third, the May 19 Communist Organization (M19CO), that carried out a string of violent acts, including the killing of two police officers and a security guard during a failed 1981 robbery of a Brink’s truck near Nyack, New York.

Barr’s first background interview was held in November 2013, 3 months after she began working at NSF. During that session, Barr answered “no” when asked if she had ever been a member of an organization “dedicated to the use of violence” to overthrow the U.S. government or to prevent others from exercising their constitutional rights. In a second interview after again being asked if she had been a member of any organization that espoused violence, Barr was grilled for 4.5 hours about her knowledge of all three organizations and several individuals with ties to them, including the persons who tried to rob the Brink’s truck. Four people were found guilty of murder in that attack and sentenced to lengthy prison terms, including Kathy Boudin, who was released in 2003 and is now an adjunct assistant professor of social work at Columbia University. “I found out about the Brink’s robbery by hearing it on the news, and just like everybody else I was shocked,” she recalls.

Barr says she is thankful that Union College has welcomed her back with open arms and says she will soon resume her teaching and research activities. In addition, she regards her year at NSF as “a very rewarding experience in many ways.” Even so, she has written to her representatives in Congress and to NSF Director France Córdova asking them to examine what she labels an “Orwellian process” for vetting rotators like herself. “We volunteer to do this,” she wrote Córdova on 29 August. Until a better process is put in place, Barr says, “NSF runs the risk that many highly qualified scientists will not even consider serving as IPAs. That will be a tremendous loss.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday September 12 2014, @05:37PM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 12 2014, @05:37PM (#92514)

    If they break your trust can you trust anything they did? Science is cold hard facts...

    Isn't the BFD about science is taht it's reproducible?

    Besides what was she thinking, America is more communist friendly now than any other point in history.

    You're showing symptoms of talk radio poisoning.

    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 12 2014, @06:49PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 12 2014, @06:49PM (#92545)

    > Isn't the BFD about science is taht it's reproducible?

    But liars waste everyone's time by making people (try) to reproduce results that are known to be false. And that's the best case.

    • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday September 12 2014, @06:53PM

      by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 12 2014, @06:53PM (#92547)
      You have to check for wrongness/lying anyway, that's science. The real problem you need to worry about is believing people who AREN'T using science, because when they lie it's a lot harder to tell.
      --
      🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
  • (Score: 2) by emg on Friday September 12 2014, @07:43PM

    by emg (3464) on Friday September 12 2014, @07:43PM (#92562)

    And how often is any experiment actually reproduced these days?

    Far too much government-funded science these days seems to consist of 'we collected a bunch of data and we tried a hundred different possible correlations and found a correlation between this thing and that thing with a 95% confidence level'. And then either no-one ever does the same thing again, or the next person do it finds no such correlation, but finds a correlation between some other thing and some other other thing.

    • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday September 12 2014, @10:17PM

      by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 12 2014, @10:17PM (#92593)
      Verification has to happen regardless of your agreement with the results.
      --
      🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈