Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Saturday August 01 2020, @05:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-look-at-the-elephant-in-the-room^W-library dept.

Internet Archive Tells Court its Digital Library is Protected Under Fair Use

The Internet Archive has filed its answer and affirmative defenses in response to a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by a group of publishers. Among other things, IA believes that its work is protected under the doctrine of fair use and the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA.

[...] The statement spends time explaining the process of CDL – Controlled Digital Lending – noting that the Internet Archive provides a digital alternative to traditional libraries carrying physical books. As such, it "poses no new harm to authors or the publishing industry."

[...] "The Internet Archive has made careful efforts to ensure its uses are lawful. The Internet Archive's CDL program is sheltered by the fair use doctrine, buttressed by traditional library protections. Specifically, the project serves the public interest in preservation, access and research—all classic fair use purposes," IA's answer reads.

"As for its effect on the market for the works in question, the books have already been bought and paid for by the libraries that own them. The public derives tremendous benefit from the program, and rights holders will gain nothing if the public is deprived of this resource."

Internet Archive's Answer and Affirmative Defenses (PDF).

Previously: Internet Archive Suspends E-Book Lending "Waiting Lists" During U.S. National Emergency
Authors Fume as Online Library "Lends" Unlimited Free Books
Publishers Sue the Internet Archive Over its Open Library, Declare it a Pirate Site
Internet Archive Ends "Emergency Library" Early to Appease Publishers
EFF and California Law Firm Durie Tangri Defending Internet Archive from Publisher Lawsuit


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by hendrikboom on Saturday August 01 2020, @06:37PM (2 children)

    by hendrikboom (1125) on Saturday August 01 2020, @06:37PM (#1029924) Homepage Journal

    However, if they DID keep records that finely detailed, we have another problem entirely. The alphabet soup in Washington now has a new database which they can subpoena for "evidence".

    With DRM on the copy being read by the archive client, there's no need to know who the client is, because the archive can take it back at any time by breaking the connexion. So there doesn't need to be any record of who the book was made available to -- just when it was made available and for how long. In fact, even this isn't necessary for the lending procedure, but could be used for an audit trail.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 01 2020, @09:46PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 01 2020, @09:46PM (#1030040)

    Came back to say something similar. Librarians are (as a group) among the strongest defenders of privacy rights. I doubt that IA keeps any user data longer than the current browsing session (but note that this is just my educated guess).

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 02 2020, @07:42AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 02 2020, @07:42AM (#1030196)

      Makes sense because they have been targeted repeatedly, and often first, throughout history by the various oppressive groups.