SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
This Twist on Schrödinger’s Cat Paradox Has Major Implications for Quantum Theory:
What does it feel like to be both alive and dead?
That question irked and inspired Hungarian-American physicist Eugene Wigner in the 1960s. He was frustrated by the paradoxes arising from the vagaries of quantum mechanics—the theory governing the microscopic realm that suggests, among many other counterintuitive things, that until a quantum system is observed, it does not necessarily have definite properties. Take his fellow physicist Erwin Schrödinger's famous thought experiment in which a cat is trapped in a box with poison that will be released if a radioactive atom decays. Radioactivity is a quantum process, so before the box is opened, the story goes, the atom has both decayed and not decayed, leaving the unfortunate cat in limbo—a so-called superposition between life and death. But does the cat experience being in superposition?
Wigner sharpened the paradox by imagining a (human) friend of his shut in a lab, measuring a quantum system. He argued it was absurd to say his friend exists in a superposition of having seen and not seen a decay unless and until Wigner opens the lab door. "The 'Wigner's friend' thought experiment shows that things can become very weird if the observer is also observed," says Nora Tischler, a quantum physicist at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia.
Now Tischler and her colleagues have carried out a version of the Wigner's friend test. By combining the classic thought experiment with another quantum head-scratcher called entanglement—a phenomenon that links particles across vast distances—they have also derived a new theorem, which they claim puts the strongest constraints yet on the fundamental nature of reality. Their study, which appeared in Nature Physics on August 17, has implications for the role that consciousness might play in quantum physics—and even whether quantum theory must be replaced.
Journal Reference:
Kok-Wei Bong, Aníbal Utreras-Alarcón, Farzad Ghafari, et al. A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner’s friend paradox, Nature Physics (DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-0990-x)
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday August 19 2020, @02:56AM
Thought experiments aren't just thought experiments. They may be extremely difficult to do even with technology far more advanced than our own, but they are possible.
Here, we already have a number of proven technologies for blowing up quantum level effects to macroscopic effects. Shutting a person into near perfect quantum sequestration (for an adequate period of time) is impossible with our present technology, but feasible. Eventually someone will do it.
Only for the observer! In the Wigner's Friend example, the observer isolated in the lab makes the observation, but to the outside world, that observation is entangled with the state that the Friend is attempting to observe. The collapse doesn't happen until the outside world observes either the Friend's state or the state of the particle that the Friend was observing (and entangled with).