Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Wednesday September 17 2014, @10:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the secret-ingredients dept.

Analysis of wild collected food (fungi in this study) found that a single packet contained three species that had previously not been formally named in science.

Accurate diagnosis of the components of our food and a standard lexicon for clear communication is essential for regulating global food trade and identifying food frauds. Reliable identification of wild collected foods can be particularly difficult, especially when they originate in under-documented regions or belong to poorly known groups such as Fungi. Porcini, one of the most widely traded wild edible mushrooms in the world, are large and conspicuous and they are used as a food both on their own and in processed food products. China is a major exporter of porcini, most of it ending up in Europe. We used DNA-sequencing to identify three species of mushroom contained within a commercial packet of dried Chinese porcini purchased in London. Surprisingly, all three have never been formally described by science and required new scientific names. This demonstrates the ubiquity of unknown fungal diversity even in widely traded commercial food products from one of the most charismatic and least overlooked groups of mushrooms. Our rapid analysis and description makes it possible to reliably identify these species, allowing their harvest to be monitored and their presence tracked in the food chain.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by monster on Friday September 19 2014, @07:19AM

    by monster (1260) on Friday September 19 2014, @07:19AM (#95385) Journal

    I'm not intending to change the way you post, just pointing out that what you may find fun, others may find distasteful or downright offensive. Also, the risk with humour in written media is you no longer have nonverbal clues about the intended mood.

    Anyway, I don't find trolling or nonsensical posts as a privilege. They are annoying and take away the good mood in comments, IMHO, but if you really want to be that kind of member of the community, it's your decision, just make sure you are aware and accept any consequences that might come with it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2