"Will software engineering always be a cowboy's game? Or is it just a case of when you're a passionate expert the pimples stand out more clearly. This guy has clearly had enough. His vents are amusing, but also raise some good points about the state of the industry."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
And yet I still meet people who studied mathematics but are unable to think logically outside that domain, and people who studied philosophy and are quite competent at logical thinking across many domains.
That might be the case in the USA, but in the UK it is most certainly called 'maths', a contraction of the word mathematics. I cannot find the work mathematic (sing) in the dictionary. Nor can the US spell checker that I used for editing the article.
We are not all Americans - this, fortunately, a very international site.
I am replying to hemocyanin who used the term 'math'.
In British English, unlike US English, there is no such word - regardless of any conjugation used. The only contraction of the word 'mathematics' is maths. It is always written that way in the UK.
Reading comprehension does not come into it. There is, to us, simply no such word. One cannot 'comprehend' words that do not exist.
Unlike myself, you would be invaluable as part of the Editorial team. Seriously, please join us.
(Score: -1, Offtopic) by xlefay on Monday March 03 2014, @12:19AM
Honestly, this article sucks ass.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by Taco Cowboy on Monday March 03 2014, @01:33AM
... there are code monkeys.
Those who can't do math are, IMHO, lower than the code monkeys.
Learning math don't only land you math ability, but also the ability to think logically, and logic is what makes programming possible.
(Score: 1) by L5GwL on Monday March 03 2014, @02:00AM
And yet I still meet people who studied mathematics but are unable to think logically outside that domain, and people who studied philosophy and are quite competent at logical thinking across many domains.
(Score: 0, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 03 2014, @02:05AM
Welcome, Taco Cowboy! Glad to see you posting unrelated comments to the first post here just as you do on Slashdot. It's such a clever trick...
(Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Monday March 03 2014, @03:56AM
... there are the pedants.
To learn math, you must first learn to count. To start with, "math" is singular.
http://www.learnersdictionary.com/blog.php?action= ViewBlogArticle&ba_id=26 [learnersdictionary.com]
(Score: 1) by janrinok on Monday March 03 2014, @09:36AM
That might be the case in the USA, but in the UK it is most certainly called 'maths', a contraction of the word mathematics. I cannot find the work mathematic (sing) in the dictionary. Nor can the US spell checker that I used for editing the article.
We are not all Americans - this, fortunately, a very international site.
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 03 2014, @01:24PM
Except Taco Cowboy used "math" but then used a third-person plural conjugation. Maybe you should work on your reading comprehension before pedanting?
(Score: 1) by janrinok on Monday March 03 2014, @02:53PM
I am replying to hemocyanin who used the term 'math'.
In British English, unlike US English, there is no such word - regardless of any conjugation used. The only contraction of the word 'mathematics' is maths. It is always written that way in the UK.
Reading comprehension does not come into it. There is, to us, simply no such word. One cannot 'comprehend' words that do not exist.
Unlike myself, you would be invaluable as part of the Editorial team. Seriously, please join us.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 03 2014, @03:59PM
Yes they used the term that Taco Cowboy did. This is what I told you.