Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Cowboy Engineers in the Software Industry

posted by janrinok on Sunday March 02 2014, @11:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the was-it-much-harder-in-my-day? dept.

shabadoo writes:

"Will software engineering always be a cowboy's game? Or is it just a case of when you're a passionate expert the pimples stand out more clearly. This guy has clearly had enough. His vents are amusing, but also raise some good points about the state of the industry."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Cowboy Engineers in the Software Industry | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 42 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Monday March 03 2014, @09:41AM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 03 2014, @09:41AM (#9963) Journal

    Again, noted. Thank you.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Monday March 03 2014, @12:35PM

    by TheRaven (270) on Monday March 03 2014, @12:35PM (#10005) Journal

    While I enjoyed the article, it definitely deserves a -1 flamebait tag. If your goal is to promote comments, then it should work (although the summary was terrible and could have done with a rewrite). If your goal is to promote interesting and informative comments, then this article is likely to fail.

    There are two very common forms of idiocy: assuming that because something is popular it is good, and assuming that because something is popular it is bad. This article poses modes of thought as a false dichotomy between these two and then tells you to pick one.

    --
    sudo mod me up

    • (Score: 2) by Open4D on Monday March 03 2014, @03:46PM

      by Open4D (371) on Monday March 03 2014, @03:46PM (#10084) Journal

      the summary was terrible and could have done with a rewrite

      I don't know if it has been changed since you wrote this, but the summary doesn't currently seem that bad to me. Is it a bit short, with insufficient detail? Yes, perhaps, but I still knew I was going to get a rant about the industry. Is it a bit idiosyncratic in its use of certain words, like 'pimple', 'vents' and 'cowboy'? Yes, but I don't necessarily expect all stories to adhere to the BBC style guide [bbc.co.uk].

      In the first week of SN I submitted 2 stories that were accepted, which weren't particularly good. I'm glad people were a bit more forgiving back in those days! Oh, how things have changed around here ...