SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Systemd has turned into the Godzilla of Linux controversies. "Everywhere you look it's stomping through blogs, rampaging through online discussion threads, and causing white-hot flames that resemble Godzilla's own breath of death," writes Jim Lynch. Now Sam Varghese reports at iTWire that although Linus Torvalds is well-known for his strong opinions, when it comes to systemd, Torvalds is neutral. "When it comes to systemd, you may expect me to have lots of colorful opinions, and I just don't," says Torvalds. "I don't personally mind systemd, and in fact my main desktop and laptop both run it."
Oh, there's been bitter fights before. Just think about the emacs vs vi wars. Or, closer to systemd, the whole "SysV init" vs "BSD init" differences certainly ended up being things that people had "heated discussions" about. Or think about the desktop comparisons.
I'm not really sure how different the systemd brawls are from those. It's technical, but admittedly the systemd developers have also been really good at alienating people on a purely personal level too. Not that that is anything particularly new under the sun _either_: the (very) bitter wars between the GPL and the BSD license camps during late-80s and early-90s were almost certainly more about the persons involved and how they pissed off people than necessarily deeply about other differences (which existed, obviously, but still).
Torvalds was asked if systemd didn't create a single point of failure which makes a system unbootable if it fails. "I think people are digging for excuses. I mean, if that is a reason to not use a piece of software, then you shouldn't use the kernel either."
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 19 2014, @06:50AM
We need a Kernel. We don't need systemd. Options are good. Systemd takes those away. Simple as that.
(Score: 2) by mtrycz on Friday September 19 2014, @09:11AM
We could use a microkernel too. And working one. So we could have more choice, and I would definately choose that.
Unfortunately people really like to do some bashing more that contributing.
In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
(Score: 2) by Geotti on Friday September 19 2014, @09:14AM
We could use a microkernel too.
Well, then you'll be happy to know that Minix 3.3 was recently released [minix3.org].
(Score: 2) by mtrycz on Friday September 19 2014, @09:29AM
Yeah, I never got around to trying that one out. Thanks.
Does it work?
In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
(Score: 3, Informative) by Geotti on Friday September 19 2014, @09:54AM
Haven't tried it myself, but supposedly Minix is (much) more than just an/for academic exercise.
(Score: 2) by tibman on Friday September 19 2014, @02:20PM
Small world, i was reading up on Minux last night. Was thinking about attempting a retro-computer and exploring OS options.
SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday September 19 2014, @11:01AM
Contributing to what exactly?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 1) by http on Friday September 19 2014, @05:28PM
Code to de-integrate systemd dependancies from common libraries. Example from recent debian bug report (762116):
... meaning, library package W is in desperate need of refactoring.
The response from an apologist was, well, apologetic and didn't make a lot of sense at first:
I was surprised to read this, since last I looked under the hood, debian used consolekit. Unfortunately a bit of research today revealed that consolekit (which was reasonably platform neutral, having ports to BSDs) was deliberately orphaned with Poettering on the team. I'm starting to see a pattern with this particular developer.
Systemd is probably a bad design, and the debian project's decision to have alternate init systems available is coming up against the hard reality that systemd does not play well with others even when in a different room.
I browse at -1 when I have mod points. It's unsettling.
(Score: 1) by soylentsandor on Friday September 19 2014, @08:33PM
http://www.d-e-f-i-n-i-t-e-l-y.com/ [d-e-f-i-n-i-t-e-l-y.com]
(Score: 2) by mtrycz on Saturday September 20 2014, @09:32AM
Thanks, I'll use that.
I actually always spell it wrong on purpose, because I can't quite remember the right spelling (but strangely I can remember this one).
In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 20 2014, @04:43PM
Yes we need something like systemd. Don't believe me? Try making a system which is suitable for end-users with just a bare kernel.
The only way to end up with something that meets the expectations (the user's, not your's) is to rewrite systemd. Maybe you'll do it better, maybe worse, but you'll still eventually rewrite systemd's functionality.