The Register has found itself subject to a certain amount of criticism for this author's skepticism ( Richard Chirgwin http://www.theregister.co.uk/Author/2242 ) regarding whether the NSA has been snooping on optical fibre cables by cutting them.
Glenn Greenwald's recent “NSA cut New Zealand's cables” story is illustrative of credibility problems that surround the ongoing Edward Snowden leak stories: everybody is too willing to accept that “if it's classified, it must be because it's true”, and along the way, attribute super-powers to spy agencies.
In running the line that undersea cables were cut, Greenwald is straying far enough from what's feasible and credible that his judgement on other claims needs to be questioned. It seems to The Register almost certain that neither Glenn Greenwald nor Edward Snowden have actually held a submarine fibre cable in their hands.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/18/spies_arent_superheroes/
Do you think that it is credible that these undersea fibre cables were tapped when it is easier to tap onshore installations?
(Score: 2) by SlimmPickens on Saturday September 20 2014, @12:24AM
Troll huh?
lol
(Score: 2) by dcollins on Saturday September 20 2014, @12:53AM
SUPER TROLL!!!
(Score: 2) by jcross on Saturday September 20 2014, @01:14AM
The moderator must have thought that whooshing sound was just superman flying by.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 20 2014, @06:24AM
Someone's sarcasm detector is badly broken.