Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by takyon

Kyrgyzstan election: Protesters storm parliament over vote-rigging claims

Protestors in Kyrgyzstan calling for the country's parliamentary election to be annulled have broken into parliament in the capital, Bishkek.

Footage showed people throwing papers from the building's windows, while others were seen entering the office of President Sooronbai Jeenbekov.

The break-in follows a day of clashes with police, who initially dispersed crowds with water cannon and tear gas.

The clashes come amid allegations of vote-rigging in last Sunday's election.

Following the vote, only four parties out of 16 passed the 7% threshold for entry into parliament, three of which have close ties to President Jeenbekov.

Kyrgyzstan election: 120 taken to hospital following result protest

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @02:56AM (22 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @02:56AM (#1061163)
    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @12:23PM (21 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @12:23PM (#1061242)

    Do you have any idea how offensive this is?

    One cannot oppose war and ethnic cleansing, however, by supporting either of the contending bourgeois camps [...] What these conflicts show is the reactionary nature of the nation-state system [...] Averting further wars and massacres, which could escalate into a devastating conflict between the major powers, requires uniting workers—in Armenia, Azerbaijan and around the world—in a socialist and anti-imperialist movement against war and the capitalist system.

    100,000,000 dead in the 20th Century under Socialism and ethic cleansing still being practiced by the CCP. The clear distinction between Fascism and Socialism is that socialist expansionism is "internationalism", not "nationalism" because that would be "fascist". A small mercy when the tanks of an occupying force amass on your borders. I know Socialists don't like facts but has it occurred to you that you may as well be linking Stormfront?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @03:32PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @03:32PM (#1061292)

      The only way to stop fascism is vote for the Biggest Idiot Democrats Ever Nominated.

      • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday October 06 2020, @06:40PM (1 child)

        by DannyB (5839) on Tuesday October 06 2020, @06:40PM (#1061349) Journal

        You seem to be under the delusion that voting for the Tarded RUMP that Republicans nominated will somehow save you from fascism.

        It won't.

        Just different brands.

        --
        If a minstrel has musical instruments attached to his bicycle, can it be called a minstrel cycle?
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @08:46PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @08:46PM (#1061390)

          We already have fascism, voted for by everyone who keeps voting democrat and republican.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @04:21PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @04:21PM (#1061302)

      lul

    • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday October 06 2020, @08:55PM (16 children)

      by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday October 06 2020, @08:55PM (#1061396)

      Wow that's stupid.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @09:22PM (15 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @09:22PM (#1061402)

        You think history [wikipedia.org] is stupid?

        • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday October 06 2020, @09:32PM (14 children)

          by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday October 06 2020, @09:32PM (#1061404)

          And then you link to something Socialism had nothing to do with with. Nice.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @10:17PM (13 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @10:17PM (#1061423)

            The invasion of Poland by both National Socialists and International Socialists had nothing to do with Socialism? Did it not start WWII either?

            • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday October 06 2020, @10:31PM (12 children)

              by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday October 06 2020, @10:31PM (#1061425)

              And North Korea is the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

              You're not making the point you think you are.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @10:44PM (11 children)

                by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 06 2020, @10:44PM (#1061429)

                "It wasn't real socialism"

                Do you have anything better?

                • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday October 06 2020, @11:46PM (10 children)

                  by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday October 06 2020, @11:46PM (#1061442)

                  You sound like a child. Are you 12, or have you just never read a book?

                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @12:14AM (9 children)

                    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @12:14AM (#1061454)

                    That's a clear "no" then, you don't have anything better, you don't know anything about the subject and resort to projection.

                    Why don't you go and read a book, so you don't look foolish in future?

                    • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday October 07 2020, @12:39AM (8 children)

                      by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday October 07 2020, @12:39AM (#1061461)

                      Why don't you read this? [britannica.com]

                      It does include a few grown-up ideas though so you might struggle a bit, but the key idea is:

                      Were the Nazis socialists? No, not in any meaningful way, and certainly not after 1934.

                      But of course the idea that the Nazis were Socialists is really only one invented by the weirdo right wing media in the US over the last few years, as explained here. [abc.net.au]

                      Just because someone says stuff a lot, doesn't make it true.

                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @02:02AM (7 children)

                        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @02:02AM (#1061485)

                        The "not real Socialism" argument again?

                        But of course the idea that the Nazis were Socialists is really only one invented by the weirdo right wing media in the US over the last few years,

                        That's an outright lie. National Socialists were Socialists! [independent.co.uk] Socialists are already promoting a disgusting, dishonest and murderous ideology - why do they feel a need to lie about Nazi Germany?

                        • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday October 07 2020, @02:26AM (6 children)

                          by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday October 07 2020, @02:26AM (#1061497)

                          So my links were too hard to read then?

                          I thought they might be.

                          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @02:30AM

                            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @02:30AM (#1061498)

                            Welcome to Soylent News?

                          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @12:20PM (4 children)

                            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @12:20PM (#1061581)

                            No, the Britannia article is written by a commie-sympathizing sophist desperate to distinguish that murderous Socialist ideology from another murderous Socialist ideology.

                            By the late 1920s, however, with the German economy in free fall, Hitler had enlisted support from wealthy industrialists who sought to pursue avowedly anti-socialist policies.

                            Saint-Simon and early utopian socialists never called for public ownership, just public control through central planning. Industrialists surrendering control to the state (Ein Volk) is entirely socialist, more the pity that the author of your article doesn't understand it as such.

                            Otto Strasser soon recognized that the Nazis were neither a party of socialists nor a party of workers,

                            The Nazis thought differently and conflict theory (class struggle) is a Marxist concept, not a Socialist one.

                            In April 1933 communists, socialists, democrats, and Jews were purged from the German civil service

                            The Krasnaya Gvardiya were the model for Squadrismo and the Schutzstaffel - the Cheka for the Gestapo where a majority (70%) were former communists (nazi rindersteak).

                            Lest there be any remaining questions about the political character of the Nazi revolution, Hitler ordered the murder of Gregor Strasser, an act that was carried out on June 30, 1934, during the Night of the Long Knives. Any remaining traces of socialist thought in the Nazi Party had been extinguished.

                            Good thing communists never murdered their political opponents otherwise we couldn't write this simple minded garbage off as the "not real socialism" argument.

                            Do you have anything better or are you going to take your own advice and read a book?

                            • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday October 07 2020, @09:20PM (3 children)

                              by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday October 07 2020, @09:20PM (#1061851)

                              You live in a fantasy world.

                              As noted before, just because you assert something, doesn't make it true, especially:

                              ...the Gestapo where a majority (70%) were former communists

                              which is a lie.

                              This would have mentioned it if it were true, but it's not. [wikipedia.org]
                              You're just arguing black is white at this point.
                               

                              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @09:49PM (2 children)

                                by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 07 2020, @09:49PM (#1061872)

                                which is a lie.

                                Absolutely is not [wikipedia.org] I could have phrased it better but was going from memory. There's no excuse for the author of the article you linked making so many fundamental mistakes.

                                As a former Marxist in his early years, Goebbels once stated "how thin the dividing line" was between communism and Nazism, which had caused many Red Front Fighters to "switch to the SA."

                                In some cities, the numeral strength of party-switching beefsteak Nazis was estimated to be large. Rudolf Diels (the head of the Gestapo from 1933 to 1934) reported that "70 percent" of the new SA recruits had been Communists in the city of Berlin.

                                • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday October 07 2020, @10:42PM (1 child)

                                  by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday October 07 2020, @10:42PM (#1061891)

                                  You're still arguing black is white.

                                  The SA were nothing to do with the Gestapo, and were purged during the Night of the Long Knives.

                                  Maybe I was wrong about you lying. You might just be completely ignorant.

                                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 08 2020, @02:08AM

                                    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 08 2020, @02:08AM (#1061953)

                                    The SA were nothing to do with the Gestapo, and were purged during the Night of the Long Knives.

                                    The Gestapo was part of the SS which was originally under the command of the SA who wanted it disbanded. The SS then supplanted the SA, placing former Freikorps members into leadership roles. Not all members of the Gestapo were members of the SS but many SS and Gestapo members had belonged to the SA.

                                    Maybe I was wrong about you lying. You might just be completely ignorant.

                                    It must take tremendous effort to willfully misunderstand Nazi ideology. [creativitypost.com] You live in a state of denial. [quadrant.org.au] The core unspoken tenet of Socialism is best summarized in this unrelated piece from a prominent Fabian Socialist, eugenicist and contemporary supporter of Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin: "Do not punish them. Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill them." [theatlantic.com]