Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday October 09 2020, @10:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the everything-zen dept.

AMD announced its first Zen 3 (Ryzen 5000 series) desktop CPUs on October 8.

Compared to Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000 series) CPUs, the Zen 3 microarchitecture has higher boost clocks and around 19% higher instructions per clock. A unified core complex die (CCD) allows 8 cores to access up to 32 MB of L3 cache, instead of two groups of 4 cores accessing 16 MB each, leading to lower latency and more cache available for any particular core. TDPs are the same as the previous generation, leading to a 24% increase in performance per Watt.

AMD estimates a 26% average increase in gaming performance at 1080p resolution, with the Zen 3 CPUs beating or tying Intel's best CPUs in most games.

Ryzen 9 5950X, 16 cores, 32 threads, boosts up to 4.9 GHz, 105W TDP, $800.
Ryzen 9 5900X, 12 cores, 24 threads, boosts up to 4.8 GHz, 105W TDP, $550.
Ryzen 7 5800X, 8 cores, 16 threads, boosts up to 4.7 GHz, 105W TDP, $450.
Ryzen 5 5600X, 6 cores, 12 threads, boosts up to 4.6 GHz, 65W TDP, $300.

You may have noticed that these prices are exactly $50 more than the launch prices for the Ryzen 3000 equivalents released in 2019. The 5600X is the only model that will ship with a bundled cooler.

The CPUs will all be available starting on November 5. AMD will stream an announcement for its RX 6000 series of high-end GPUs on October 28.

See also: AMD Zen 3 Announcement by Lisa Su: A Live Blog at Noon ET (16:00 UTC)
AMD Teases Radeon RX 6000 Card Performance Numbers: Aiming For 3080?

Previously: AMD's Zen 3 CPUs Will Not be Compatible with X470, B450, and Older Motherboards
AMD Reverses BIOS Decision, Intends to Support Zen 3 on B450 and X470 Motherboards
AMD Launching 3900XT, 3800XT, and 3600XT Zen 2 Refresh CPUs: Milking Matisse
AMD Zen 3, Ryzen 4000 Release Date, Specifications, Performance, All We Know


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Freeman on Friday October 09 2020, @05:29PM (7 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Friday October 09 2020, @05:29PM (#1062596) Journal

    Like you, I've got a 3600 running in my latest machine. I'm going to be waiting for a price drop on the new CPUs, before I upgrade. I can also tell you now, you're likely to get more noticeable performance increases by switching from HDD *retarded slow speed* to SSD *400MB/s* or SSD to NVMe SSD *1600 to 3200MB/s*, than any upgrade you do.

    I've been playing Space Engineers lately and it's a pretty demanding game. CPU usage goes back up and down not really hitting a lot more than 25%, while my RX480 has hit around 50-60% usage. Admittedly, I'm running at 1360x768 resolution on an old 32inch lcd monitor. With higher resolution it may increase CPU usage a bit. I would expect it to hit the GPU a lot more, though.

    I haven't run Mount and Blade II: Bannerlords for a while, because 40GB+ update . . ., but that would likely be a much better game to test.

    Really, just get something like https://www.nzxt.com/camapp [nzxt.com] and you'll see the usage while you play and record. Then, you'll be able to make a bit more of an informed decision on, "Do I actually need anything better than what I've got?". I thought that 32GB RAM may have been a bit of overkill, but looking at the usage in a game like Space Engineers, 16GB is almost too little. 32GB looks a lot better when you factor in running a music player, a browser, a chat program, and / or a streaming/recording program, while playing games.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 09 2020, @06:48PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 09 2020, @06:48PM (#1062656)

    yeah, when i upgraded from my bulldozer guts recently, i went with a ryzen 5 2600 for $125, but got an nvme ssd at 3000 MB p/s. the cp+ram is 2-3 times faster(IIRC) and the ssd is 6 times faster. bought the asrock hdv MB for like $50. very cheap guts and plenty powerful. maybe in 5 years i'll move up to zen4 or something. all i do is code and surf for the most part and the compile times are fast enough for me at this point. if i start writing huge compiled lang applications maybe i'll care more then.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Friday October 09 2020, @07:38PM (2 children)

      by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Friday October 09 2020, @07:38PM (#1062706) Journal

      Zen 4 could have a big (1 GB or larger) L4 cache stacked on the I/O die. That could contribute to the general IPC gains, or just benefit certain applications. There's also rumors [wccftech.com] of a graphics chiplet, so you might not need a discrete GPU anymore. Higher core counts are likely, e.g. 24 cores for a 5950X replacement. A TSMC "5nm" node should allow for smaller 8-core chiplets or 12 cores per chiplet.

      If all of the above is correct, Zen 4 would be a great option for someone who wants absurdly high compute performance, but doesn't care about gaming (although an RDNA 3 chiplet might be sufficient for gaming too).

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 10 2020, @12:43PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 10 2020, @12:43PM (#1062951)

        you can get a pci-e slot card that has a socket for sfp+ module. these modules have 10Gbps versions ... or if you have the estate ... 80km... from your pci-e slot ... errr ...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 10 2020, @06:53PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 10 2020, @06:53PM (#1063020)

        Yep, that's me. For me, programming IS the game.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by turgid on Friday October 09 2020, @07:21PM (2 children)

    by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 09 2020, @07:21PM (#1062693) Journal

    I've got a Ryzen 3600 but I put 32GB of RAM in it. It's enough RAM that I can have a 16GB temp fs all in RAM and run things off that, so I can completely bypass hard disks. That way you can easily saturate the CPU.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 10 2020, @06:44PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 10 2020, @06:44PM (#1063017)

      i've done some of this before, but didn't find a robust solution to things at the time. what are you using to sync between ssd and tempfs for persistance?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 11 2020, @10:00AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 11 2020, @10:00AM (#1063177)

        There are a couple solutions you can use. One is to increase the time data spend in the buffer before flushing. Another is to use a union file system. Another is to use a synchronizer like asd or unison or even a properly configured rsync. The most robust solution is a combination of the three.