Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday October 28 2020, @11:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the graphic-news! dept.

AMD announced its first RDNA 2 (Radeon RX 6000 series) gaming GPUs during a live stream (24m42s) on October 28.

AMD originally planned for RDNA 2 to have 50% more performance per Watt than GPUs using the RDNA 1 microarchitecture. Now, AMD is claiming 54% more performance per Watt for the RX 6800 XT and RX 6800, and 65% more performance per Watt for the RX 6900 XT. Part of the efficiency gain is due to the use of "Infinity Cache", similar to the L3 cache found in Ryzen CPUs. This allowed AMD to use a 256-bit memory bus with 2.17x the effective memory bandwidth of a 384-bit bus, while using slightly less power.

The RX 6900 XT ($1000) has performance comparable to Nvidia's RTX 3090, with a total board power (TBP) of 300 Watts. The RX 6800 XT ($650) is comparable to Nvidia's RTX 3080, also with a 300 Watt TBP. The RX 6800 ($580) is around 18% faster than Nvidia's RTX 2080 Ti, with a 250 Watt TBP. All three of the GPUs have 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM and 128 MB of "Infinity Cache".

The 6800 XT and 6800 will be available starting on November 18, while the 6900 XT will be available on December 8.

Also at Tom's Hardware, Phoronix, Ars Technica, and Guru3D.

Previously: Nvidia Announces RTX 30-Series "Ampere" GPUs
AMD Announces Zen 3 CPUs


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jasassin on Thursday October 29 2020, @04:42AM

    by jasassin (3566) <jasassin@gmail.com> on Thursday October 29 2020, @04:42AM (#1070246) Homepage Journal

    Wrong. If people stop buying this stuff, then they will stop making it.

    They might stop making $1000 cards, but it's not like they are going to throw their hands in the air and close up shop. They'd make more realistically priced consumer cards.

    I understand where you're coming from, really I do. I think the car analogy is interesting because owning a car that can go 330MPH with 75MPH speed limits is not quite the same as a video card that can run flight sim on max settings at 4K at 144FPS. At least you could push the card to the limit all the time with no legal or bodily worries... but still... $1000 for a video card, in my mind, is almost as an obscenely overpriced object.

    While we're at it, why don't they mass produce Lamborghini's and sell them for the same profit margins as other cars? It's the Apple/Name/Status symbol. It's not really because people are driving 300MPH.

    If they sold gullwing cars that looked like a Lamborghini with the engine of a Honda Civic would they sell like hotcakes,or it really the horsepower people care about?

    --
    jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0x663EB663D1E7F223
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2