Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday October 28 2020, @11:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the graphic-news! dept.

AMD announced its first RDNA 2 (Radeon RX 6000 series) gaming GPUs during a live stream (24m42s) on October 28.

AMD originally planned for RDNA 2 to have 50% more performance per Watt than GPUs using the RDNA 1 microarchitecture. Now, AMD is claiming 54% more performance per Watt for the RX 6800 XT and RX 6800, and 65% more performance per Watt for the RX 6900 XT. Part of the efficiency gain is due to the use of "Infinity Cache", similar to the L3 cache found in Ryzen CPUs. This allowed AMD to use a 256-bit memory bus with 2.17x the effective memory bandwidth of a 384-bit bus, while using slightly less power.

The RX 6900 XT ($1000) has performance comparable to Nvidia's RTX 3090, with a total board power (TBP) of 300 Watts. The RX 6800 XT ($650) is comparable to Nvidia's RTX 3080, also with a 300 Watt TBP. The RX 6800 ($580) is around 18% faster than Nvidia's RTX 2080 Ti, with a 250 Watt TBP. All three of the GPUs have 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM and 128 MB of "Infinity Cache".

The 6800 XT and 6800 will be available starting on November 18, while the 6900 XT will be available on December 8.

Also at Tom's Hardware, Phoronix, Ars Technica, and Guru3D.

Previously: Nvidia Announces RTX 30-Series "Ampere" GPUs
AMD Announces Zen 3 CPUs


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 29 2020, @08:45PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 29 2020, @08:45PM (#1070518)

    *sigh* ... if only they wouldn't use sooo much power. shhesh >300 Watt?
    maybe wait for the die-shrink? else i am gonna go spend the money on 2 square meters of silicon that MAKE energy instead of consuming it? or so sayZ alyx in half life 3 ^_^

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday October 30 2020, @01:04AM

    by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Friday October 30 2020, @01:04AM (#1070628) Journal

    Technically, they did die shrink. But they allegedly tried to play hardball with TSMC and got shafted onto Samsung's shitty "8nm" ("10nm" derivative) node instead. Then they put fast but hot GDDR6X on top of that.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]