Aren't you glad to know that your votes don't actually count and that Hillary Clinton is one of mere 538 people in the United States whose vote actually does count?
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 29 2020, @01:53AM
(4 children)
by Anonymous Coward
on Thursday October 29 2020, @01:53AM (#1070188)
Well, if that comes to pass, then it will be time for liberals to pull a conservative aww-gee-shucks and say "well, it wasn't illegal, whatcha gonna do?"
Thanks for destroying political discourse in the US Republicans!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 29 2020, @12:06AM (5 children)
... a faithless elector throws the election?
... what if Hillary is that faithless elector?
She'd definitely become even more memeable than she is now, anyway.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 29 2020, @01:53AM (4 children)
Well, if that comes to pass, then it will be time for liberals to pull a conservative aww-gee-shucks and say "well, it wasn't illegal, whatcha gonna do?"
Thanks for destroying political discourse in the US Republicans!
(Score: 3, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Thursday October 29 2020, @03:55PM
AKA the McConnell Rule
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 29 2020, @05:44PM (2 children)
Yeah, I think the democratic party's lease on that argument ran out sometime before WWII when FDR wanted to pack a court.
I mean, he didn't get to do it, but he gave it the ol' college try.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Thursday October 29 2020, @05:53PM (1 child)
Yes, the magic immutable number is NINE. NINE shall there be and always shall there be exactly NINE!
Unless Obama.... then eight is cool.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 01 2020, @01:44AM
That doesn't really comport with the history of the court-packing argument.
But, y'know, whatever. Go change the court's makeup. Nobody could possibly see that as a desperate power grab. What could possibly go wrong?