Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Wednesday September 24 2014, @03:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the just-walk-it-off dept.

From Men's Journal:

Every time you walk into a physician's office, you run the risk of overtreatment: Tests you don't need, medications that are ineffective (or dangerous), procedures that cause more problems than they solve. In many cases the best thing for your health is to do nothing.

Make no mistake: A good doctor is, or should be, your most trusted resource if you're sick. If you're not sick and he wants to treat you anyway, that doesn't necessarily make him a bad doctor. But it does make him a player in a system that operates according to the unspoken and often unexamined assumption that more treatment is better for the patient. It's unquestionably better for the financial health of the stakeholders in the system: the doctors, the pharmaceutical industry, the health-insurance companies, and the hospitals. If you don't know how the game is played, the odds go up that you'll wind up the loser.

What do you people think, will people change if they know this?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by rcamera on Wednesday September 24 2014, @06:00PM

    by rcamera (2360) on Wednesday September 24 2014, @06:00PM (#97798) Homepage Journal
    that was kind of a big whoosh to miss. it was, in fact, the entire post that whoosh'd you. study up a bit on this [wikipedia.org].

    fyi - hawking is british and actually credits the NHS with saving his life [telegraph.co.uk]. did you know oxford isn't in the good 'ol us-of-a?
    --
    /* no comment */
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by wantkitteh on Wednesday September 24 2014, @07:10PM

    by wantkitteh (3362) on Wednesday September 24 2014, @07:10PM (#97834) Homepage Journal

    "A big whoosh" - is that what you call it when you complete fail to put any actual indication of sarcasm in your writing? I suggest learning the basics of forming sentences and punctuation before you attempt such difficult things as the lowest form of wit.

    • (Score: 1, Flamebait) by isostatic on Wednesday September 24 2014, @08:20PM

      by isostatic (365) on Wednesday September 24 2014, @08:20PM (#97870) Journal

      Funny how Americans can't sport sarcasm unless it is covered in massive glowing lights. Sigh.

      • (Score: 2) by hoochiecoochieman on Thursday September 25 2014, @09:06AM

        by hoochiecoochieman (4158) on Thursday September 25 2014, @09:06AM (#98142)

        Dude, you really fooled me! And I'm not an American.

        Ok, ok, I reckon I had a knee-jerk reaction, but this wasn't an easy one to spot. I should have seen that it was too stupid to be sincere. But there are actually people out there who are that stupid.

      • (Score: 2, Informative) by rcamera on Thursday September 25 2014, @06:00PM

        by rcamera (2360) on Thursday September 25 2014, @06:00PM (#98342) Homepage Journal
        i AM american, and i thought it was hilarious. it's always fun to bait people with incorrect statements that you KNOW they think are true.

        but on the more serious side, the infant mortality rate isn't a fair comparison. in the US, we consider a live birth to be... well... anyone that's born alive. many other countries don't count a "live birth" unless the fetus meets certain weight or gestation duration requirements. we count preemies in our IMR - they don't.
        --
        /* no comment */