Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday September 25 2014, @03:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the we'll-need-day-care-for-the-ai dept.

From ScienceDaily:

The computer programs used in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) are highly specialized. They can for example fly airplanes, play chess or assemble cars in controlled industrial environments.

A research team from Gothenburg, Sweden, has now been able to create an AI programme that can learn how to solve problems in many different areas. The programme is designed to imitate certain aspects of children's cognitive development. Traditional AI programmes lack the versatility and adaptability of human intelligence. For example, they cannot come into a new home and cook, clean and do laundry. In artificial general intelligence (AGI), which is a new field within AI, scientists try to create computer programmes with a generalised type of intelligence, enabling them to solve problems in vastly different areas.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Thursday September 25 2014, @05:19PM

    by HiThere (866) on Thursday September 25 2014, @05:19PM (#98329) Journal

    That's the place where nearly everyone goes wrong. They confuse intelligence with both motivational structure and with purposes, when it's neither.

    From my point of view, the main problem is in the motivational structure. Lots of work is already being done on intelligence, and purposes are desired to be rather simple. (Almost "Do what you're told!" simple. The question is who do they accept has the right to do the telling.) FWIW, Asimov's robot stories were all about the motivational structure of the robots. They were just assumed to be sufficiently intelligent, the the purposes were specified by the three laws. (I don't think Asimov consciously analysed the problem in this way, but he was a good writer.)

    N.B.: A story testing intelligence would be a puzzle story. Puzzles were only a minor part of the robot stories, and those puzzled were the humans, not the robots. And there was often a purpose framework given beyond the 3 laws, but it was explicitly specified. E.g. the robots on sunside Mercury that could only move when carrying a human. (I suppose you could argue that that was a part of their motivational framework that was made explicit, but if so it would be overridden by the 1st law, and it explicitly wasn't.)

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2