Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

QAnon again - fascinating

Journal by c0lo

A Game Designer’s Analysis Of QAnon - Playing with reality (20min+ read. A bit lengthy, but it worth)

In brief - apophenia. Just a tad more elaborated - induced/guided aphonenia.

What's fascinating is the buttons of human psyche that are pushed to sink people deep into the rabbit holes:
- Follow The Breadcrumbs - don't tell, just select the dots that are to be connected
- The Eureka Effect - the rush of the Aha! moments and the feeling of being rewarded
- Lamestream Media - passivate against the reality that's not supportive to the agenda
- Community - sense of belonging, behavior reinforcement; a population large and motivated enough to adopt an evolutionary strategy in selecting the best CT-es

All the above are exemplified - and these examples is how I got to get WTF Beyoncé has to do with QAnon.

So, if all it's an Alternate Reality Game, there's no harm, right? Not so fast, the US Military Academy ran the The QAnon Conspiracy Theory: A Security Threat in the Making? article in its "Combating Terrorism Center" journal, stating

QAnon represents a public security threat with the potential in the future to become a more impactful domestic terror threat. This is true especially given that conspiracy theories have a track record of propelling terrorist violence elsewhere in the West as well as QAnon’s more recent influence on mainstream political discourse.

QAnon again - fascinating | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 102 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday November 19 2020, @01:32AM (7 children)

    by c0lo (156) on Thursday November 19 2020, @01:32AM (#1079042) Journal

    BTW, I was referring to the narrative spun by the author of the second piece. That's not the US military.

    No, it's the "Combating Terrorism Center" of the West Point Millitary Academy which published it as a study and not as an opinion piece.

    I feel you're thinking "the progs infiltrated the Army too", yeah?
    It matters not to you that they based their analysis on real life cases, because it contradicts your beliefs and you're not gonna drop those beliefs, reality be damn'd.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday November 19 2020, @02:03AM (6 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 19 2020, @02:03AM (#1079053) Journal

    No, it's the "Combating Terrorism Center" of the West Point Millitary Academy which published it as a study and not as an opinion piece.

    Opinion pieces published as studies are still opinion pieces. This isn't your first time you've made this mistake [soylentnews.org].

    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday November 19 2020, @02:12AM (2 children)

      by c0lo (156) on Thursday November 19 2020, @02:12AM (#1079056) Journal

      I'll let you with your opinions of this was not a study, and it's not published by the US Army and QAnon is just a bunch of funny guys.

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday November 19 2020, @03:55AM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 19 2020, @03:55AM (#1079074) Journal
        You're committing the argument from authority fallacy. An opinion piece, published by the US Army is still an opinion piece.

        and QAnon is just a bunch of funny guys.

        Where's the evidence otherwise? Seriously, you'll get bad eggs in any grouping of people, much less a crazy one. For a bunch of crazy people, they're pretty peaceful.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday November 19 2020, @04:06PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 19 2020, @04:06PM (#1079241) Journal
        For another example that this is an opinion piece, consider the weasel-speak I quoted.

        Already, then, QAnon supporters are trying to have an increased impact on mainstream discourse in the United States. With this mainstreaming, as well as the impending presidential election that seems likely to only increase QAnon’s salience, an increasing frequency of criminal or violent acts by QAnon supporters seems possible, even likely.

        "Seems possible, even likely".

        However, the threat to public security that QAnon presents is not exclusive to the movement and the cases described above, but rather, is representative of broader currents in the American information landscape. The increased consumption and circulation of misinformation on social media, as well as its negative consequences, is evinced especially by QAnon, but its effects on public safety are not limited to it. The emergence of future (related or unrelated) conspiracy theories that may be effective at radicalizing individuals to terrorist violence should thus not be ruled out as threats to public security.

        "should thus not be ruled out".

        Regulation of QAnon content by social media companies, activity which would be guided and governed by the adherence of QAnon supporters to respective platforms terms of service, may present one pathway to decreasing the likelihood of individual radicalization to violence.104 This could operate similarly to Facebook and Twitter regulation of jihadi content by the Islamic State and al-Qa`ida affiliates. On July 21, 2020, Twitter announced105 that it will be taking action against QAnon in light of “coordinated harmful activity.” Already Twitter has suspended 7,000 accounts and will be limiting 150,000 more.106

        "may present".

        There's all these dire predictions that "may" happen about things that "seem" bad possibly. What's missing is the null hypothesis - that QAnon might not have detrimental effects.

        Here's my take. Crazy people will believe crazy things anyway - you're not talking about a group that would be healthy, productive members of society in the absence of QAnon. And while they're ranting about child-eating molesters on the internets (or whatever the present QAnon thing is), they're socializing and not breaking stuff or hurting people.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 19 2020, @06:09AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 19 2020, @06:09AM (#1079100)

      khallow, he is just kind of pink and fluffy collateral damage. He has no idea how he is being played, and in this regard, he resembles closely the Runaway, with the potentional difference that khallow has read some books.

      (Oh, and khallow, since you didn't get it the first, or second or third, times, remember when you wanted me to remind you when you did that thing we talked about, again? Well, you are doing it again, just to let you know. If you don't remember, I have to say that those abducting aliens are nothing if not thorough!!)

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday November 19 2020, @03:15PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 19 2020, @03:15PM (#1079200) Journal

        He has no idea how he is being played

        By who?

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday November 19 2020, @03:16PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 19 2020, @03:16PM (#1079201) Journal

        Oh, and khallow, since you didn't get it the first, or second or third, times, remember when you wanted me to remind you when you did that thing we talked about, again?

        I no longer care. It's quite clear you're doing this in bad faith.