SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Journal by DeathMonkey
the world's town square
Speak freely and express yourself openly, without fear of being “deplatformed” for your views. Engage with real people, not bots. Parler is people and privacy-focused, and gives you the tools you need to curate your Parler experience.
As Predicted: Parler Is Banning Users It Doesn't Like
Conservatives are flocking to a new 'free speech' social media app that has started banning liberal users
Parler, the 'Free Speech' platform is already banning people
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 42 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Now KEN and BARBIE are PERMANENTLY ADDICTED to MIND-ALTERING DRUGS ...
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday November 18 2020, @10:00PM (9 children)
The code is very simple: when they speak of freedom, liberty, etc., there is a very strong ingroup/outgroup divide. The freedoms and liberties are only for the ingroup, and they are freedoms and liberties to do certain things to the outgroup. In other words, said freedoms and liberties are negative-sum; they are the freedom to remove *other peoples'" liberties.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 3, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday November 18 2020, @10:09PM
Free Speech: My right to censor whoever I want but to also force you to publish whatever I want.
(Score: 2) by cmdrklarg on Wednesday November 18 2020, @10:20PM (1 child)
Conservative Freedom: freedom to impose their will on everyone else.
aka "my fist doesn't stop at your nose"
Answer now is don't give in; aim for a new tomorrow.
(Score: 2) by dry on Friday November 20 2020, @06:58AM
It's been updated to "my spit doesn't stop at your nose"
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 18 2020, @10:57PM
Relax! The market will sort this, won't it? </sarcasm>
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 18 2020, @11:25PM
You are speaking of Twatter, right?
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 18 2020, @11:51PM
I always wonder why bullies imagine they got a monopoly on harming others. When you get to eat what you dish out, the indignation is always SO righteous: "How dare they! Prey should not fight back! No fair!!!"
Do not do unto others, what you don't want done unto you. Else do not whine when you get an answer in kind.
(Score: 5, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 19 2020, @02:03AM (1 child)
It's a lot like Turning Point USA's Professor Watchlist [professorwatchlist.org], which supposedly is a list of professors that push liberal views in the classroom.
If you look at the actual watchlist, you'll find many faculty who are on there for things they did outside of the classroom like writing op-ends or posting their political views on Twitter. Those cases don't even attempt to make the case that liberal views were pushed in the classroom, but that they expressed views on their own time that TPUSA dislikes. You'll also find faculty who assigned students to do things like research and argue for positions they disagree with. That's not liberal bias; it's critical thinking and understanding both sides of an issue. TPUSA claims they support free speech but they seem more interested in silencing speech they disagree with.
No, faculty should not be pushing their political views on students. That would be wrong. But this doesn't mean that faculty have to entertain factually incorrect nonsense to give the appearance of neutrality.
To give you an example, I teach a class about climate change. It does venture into some of the societal issues. Neutrality means that I treated Libertarian ideas about mitigation and adaptation with the same respect that I treated Democratic ideas. That meant that the students were assigned to read articles from reason.com and similar sites. The articles all implicitly or explicitly supported the theory that humans are responsible for much of the warming observed over recent decades, a theory that has been tested and supported by a very large number of experiments. Libertarian ideas for solutions deserve the same platform as Democratic ideas like carbon taxes. However, neutrality does not mean giving a platform to Republicans who want to deny a well-tested theory. I did make it a point to praise Republican politicians like Teddy Roosevelt, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George Bush, who promoted environmental policies like creating the National Park System, the Clean Air Act, and the Montral Protocol, which were enacted on the basis of good science.
I'm all for the free exchange of ideas. But neutrality doesn't mean putting BS and lies on equal footing with facts and truth.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 19 2020, @04:47AM
That site is hilarious. I know one of the professors on that list. They are a life-long Republican and conservative. I wonder what they'll think about being labeled a professor "who discriminate[s] against conservative students and advance[s] leftist propaganda in the classroom." Other than laughing out loud, that is.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Thursday November 19 2020, @04:15PM
The people who scream the loudest about "maw rats" are the least concerned with anyone else's rights.
If you eat an entire cake without cutting it, you technically only had one piece.