The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2020, @08:22PM
(3 children)
by Anonymous Coward
on Friday November 20 2020, @08:22PM (#1079951)
It wouldn't be hard to believe democrats saying that the lack of fraud evidence means no fraud... if not for the fact that democrats blocked all measures to detect fraud. You get no presumption of innocence here. When you purposely make fraud impossible to detect, the only reasonable assumption is that you did indeed commit fraud. Why else would you fight so hard against anti-fraud measures?
Just remember that the people who create the communist take-over are usually the first people shot. They are troublemakers who are no longer needed. (that's you)
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2020, @08:22PM (3 children)
It wouldn't be hard to believe democrats saying that the lack of fraud evidence means no fraud... if not for the fact that democrats blocked all measures to detect fraud. You get no presumption of innocence here. When you purposely make fraud impossible to detect, the only reasonable assumption is that you did indeed commit fraud. Why else would you fight so hard against anti-fraud measures?
Just remember that the people who create the communist take-over are usually the first people shot. They are troublemakers who are no longer needed. (that's you)
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2020, @09:02PM (2 children)
You got that backwards: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/482569-senate-gop-blocks-three-election-security-bills [thehill.com]
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2020, @09:41PM (1 child)
Democrats proposed changes that would mandate vote-by-mail and prohibit ID requirements. That is exactly backwards of honest election security.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 21 2020, @01:00AM
[Citation Needed, Motherfucker]