Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

The only thing better than watching Biden win Georgia...

Journal by DeathMonkey

...is watching Biden win Georgia TWICE!

Georgia recount confirms Biden victory and finds no widespread fraud after statewide audit

The only thing better than watching Biden win Georgia... | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 92 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 21 2020, @07:38PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 21 2020, @07:38PM (#1080220)

    Recent declassified evidence showed that the "russia gate" scandal was invented by the Hillary campaign to try to win the 2016 election.

    Which is why the Muller report could not find any evidence of russian interference, even after 2+ years of hunting for it.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 22 2020, @01:35AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 22 2020, @01:35AM (#1080318)

    OK Putin

  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 22 2020, @05:23AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 22 2020, @05:23AM (#1080358)

    Thanks for trying to lie about something we have direct quotes from Mueller about.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/did-mueller-mean-trump-could-be-indicted-when-he-leaves-n1033901 [nbcnews.com]

    "I believe a reasonable person looking at these facts could conclude that all three elements of the crime of obstruction of justice have been met, and I'd like to ask you the reason, again, you did not indict Donald Trump is because of the OLC (the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel) opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?" Lieu asked.

    "That is correct," Mueller [responded]. *it says "Mueller asked" in the article but it was just a response*

    Mueller had no desire to be a part of the political narrative so he stuck to his restricted scope and did not speculate beyond that specific boundary. Props to Mueller for being professional.

    That is just for Trump's crimes.

    Now, for your dumb fuck vodka induced inane input:

    Questioner (video didn't show her name), "Would you agree that it was not a hoax that the Russians were engaged in trying to impact our election?"

    Mueller, "Absolutely. That was not a hoax. The indictments we returned against the Russians were substantial in their scope."

    https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/here-are-the-key-moments-from-mueller-s-testimony-64477253602 [nbcnews.com]

    Mueller, "The expectation was, if we did subpoena the president he would fight the subpoena and we would be in the midst of the investigation for a significant period of time." The president did answer in writing but ignored several of the questions.

    So go blow it out yer ass, congratulations on duping a bunch of old uneducated Americans who have been primed by the greedy machinations of the GOP. You shouldn't feel proud, you should feel dirty. The majority of the US understands what you're doing, as does the rest of the world, so don't feel too superior in trolling a bunch of scared and/or angry people. Your president treats you and everyone you know as a slave and your democracy is more laughable than Iran!