Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday December 03 2020, @05:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-goes-up-must-come-down dept.

Boeing's upgraded 737 MAX completes first flight with media onboard:

DALLAS (Reuters) - Boeing Co's 737 MAX staged its first post-grounding flight with media on board on Wednesday, as carriers seek to demonstrate to passengers that the redesigned jet is safe after a 20-month safety ban.

[...] Wednesday's American Airlines 737 MAX flight was a 45-minute hop from Dallas, Texas, to Tulsa, Oklahoma. It comes weeks before the first commercial passenger flight on Dec. 29, and is part of a public relations effort to allay any concerns about the aircraft.

Boeing's best-selling jet was grounded in March 2019 after two crashes in five months killed a combined 346 people, marking the industry's worst safety crisis in decades and undermining U.S. aviation regulatory leadership.

Wednesday's flight marked the first time anyone besides regulators and industry personnel flew on the MAX since the grounding, which ignited investigations focusing on software that overwhelmed pilots.

The mood on Wednesday's flight, which included a Reuters reporter, was subdued. Some passengers mingled and chatted before landing, when applause broke out.

[...] Boeing is bracing for intense publicity from even routine glitches by manning a 24-hour "situation room" to monitor every MAX flight globally, and has briefed some industry commentators on details on the return to service, industry sources said.

"We are continuing to work closely with global regulators and our customers to safely return the fleet to commercial service," a Boeing spokesman said.

[...] In an example of how airlines have begun to soft-pedal references to the MAX brand, the safety cards on Wednesday's flight omitted the "MAX" name and just said "737."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 03 2020, @07:50PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 03 2020, @07:50PM (#1083749)

    And I also don't consider it a coincidence that they rushed to get this done before Inauguration Day.

    What is the implication you're making here?

  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Thursday December 03 2020, @09:01PM (1 child)

    by Thexalon (636) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 03 2020, @09:01PM (#1083761)

    That the Republican Party tends to be looser on regulations than the Democratic Party, and thus businesses trying to do something that's only kinda-sorta OK on the regulation front will try to get their thing approved under a Republican-controlled administration.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 03 2020, @09:48PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 03 2020, @09:48PM (#1083782)

      Oh please! The Democratic party is corporatist too. They just have possibly a different set of corporations they favor, or even an overlapping set. It's all determined by whoever donates to the politician or does their dirty work for them. See all the Social Media / Big Tech company people who worked for/with Obama's gov, worked against Trump, and are lined up to work with Biden. Do you think Democrats are going to regulate Big Tech?