Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Saturday September 27 2014, @10:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the i'm-on-the-plane..-NO,-PLANE dept.

El Reg reports:

If you fancy spending your next European airline flight sitting next to someone who's carrying on a protracted conversation via mobile phone, you're in luck.

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has issued new guidance to European airlines allowing them to permit passengers to keep phones and other portable electronic devices (PEDs) switched on throughout flights, regardless of whether the devices are in "airplane mode."

"This is the latest regulatory step towards enabling the ability to offer 'gate-to-gate' telecommunication or WiFi services," the agency said on Friday.

The regulators define PEDs as "any kind of electronic device brought on board the aircraft by a passenger such as a tablet, a laptop, a smartphone, an e-reader or a MP3 player."

EASA loosened its restrictions on devices in 2013 such that passengers don't have to switch them off, provided their Wi-Fi, cellular, Bluetooth, and other radios are disabled.

With the new guidance issued on Friday, airplane mode becomes something of a misnomer, as passengers are free to leave their devices' radios active throughout takeoff, landing, and the flight itself.

That's not to say airlines have been given a rubber stamp to let passengers do whatever they want. Each carrier must go through an assessment process to ensure that aircraft are not affected by transmissions coming from passengers' devices -- and submitting to the assessment is entirely voluntary.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by monster on Tuesday September 30 2014, @03:08PM

    by monster (1260) on Tuesday September 30 2014, @03:08PM (#100017) Journal

    I think you are misrepresenting my post. To clarify:

    - A one time occurrence is by definition not harassment. At least not in sane legal systems.
    - As much as money and power may get someone special treatment, that doesn't make it a right.
    - Signs are not law. Trespassing needs to physically enter the property, not just knocking the door. As for disturbing the peace, I'll concede that it's a convenient catchall for LEOs, but good luck arguing it as a commoner.
    - There's quite a difference between cops showing up for a noise complaint and getting a citation: If when they arrive there's no noise and no witnesses, it's not an stablished fact and therefore you wound't get the fine. When it's an event maintained for some time then it's against the ordinances, but that's not the same, again a one-off event against a continued occurrence.

    Anyway, the point to my post was not to hairsplit over legislation, but to specify that certain social conventions are just that, not stablished rights. Being polite to other people is one of them.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2