SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
I may be 72," Maria Arredondo from Michigan told us when we called her. "But I'm alive and breathing. My mind is working fine and I'm healthy."
Maria said she had voted for Joe Biden and was surprised to hear that her name had appeared on a list of supposedly dead voters in the state.
We spoke to other people in similar situations to that of Maria in Michigan and found similar stories.
To test the list, we picked 30 names at random. To this we added the oldest person on the list.
Of this list of 31 names, we managed to speak directly to 11 people (or to a family member, neighbour or care home worker) to confirm they were still alive.
For 17 others, there was no public record of their death, and we found clear evidence that they were alive after the alleged date of death on the list of 10,000. A clear pattern emerged - the wrong records had been joined together to create a false match.
Finally, we found that three people on the list were indeed dead. We examine these cases later.
When we looked for another centenarian, who according to the list had died in 1977, we found that she had still been alive when her postal ballot was returned in September. However, a neighbour told us the woman had died just a few weeks ago. We also found a matching obituary from October to confirm this.
Two other men on our list of 31 died some time ago, yet votes had been cast in their names - with the correct postcodes and years of birth - according to the voting database.
We found that for both men, there were sons with the same name currently registered at the same address as their deceased fathers.
In both cases, a ballot was sent in for the dead fathers.
Local election officials told us that one of the votes had been counted but there was no record of the son having voted.
In the other, it was the son who actually voted, but it had been recorded as the father's due to a clerical error.
US Election 2020: The 'dead voters' in Michigan who are still alive
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Thursday December 10 2020, @08:47PM (4 children)
There is no evidence of course. The very last of the bullshit lawsuits concedes this fact by claiming the fraud they are fighting is "undetectable."
The Trump team throws in the towel on proving voter fraud [washingtonpost.com]
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 10 2020, @09:19PM (2 children)
Any scientist should be cringing at that statement. Republicans have ensured that their allegations of fraud aren't falsifiable. That means they're also not a valid theory to explain the outcome of the election.
I'm just angry that the attorney general in my state (Doug Peterson) is wasting time and probably taxpayer money on this nonsense. Surely there are much better things that he should be doing.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 10 2020, @10:11PM
If he's wasting time, he's wasting taxpayer money.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 13 2020, @08:24PM
If they are not going to cringe at "the science is settled", then they won't cringe at "undetectable fraud" either.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 11 2020, @03:34AM
You also have to appreciate the irony of Texas suing because other states non-legislatively changed election procedures when they themselves did the same.