Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

GitHub Removes its Annoying Cookie Banners

posted by Fnord666 on Monday December 21 2020, @12:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the a-good-start dept.

upstart writes in with an IRC submission for Runaway1956:

GitHub removes its annoying cookie banners:

Cookie banners are one of the most annoying parts of browsing the web, forcing you to click accept or deny on multiple sites. Microsoft-owned GitHub is starting to address this aggravation by removing cookie banners from its site this week. "At GitHub, we want to protect developer privacy, and we find cookie banners quite irritating, so we decided to look for a solution," explains GitHub CEO Nat Friedman. "After a brief search, we found one: just don't use any non-essential cookies. Pretty simple, really."

GitHub, which operates independently from Microsoft, has now removed all nonessential cookies, meaning the site doesn't send any information to third-party analytics services. This is a change that's turned into a commitment, so GitHub will only ever use cookies that are required and none to track, display ads, or send information elsewhere.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
GitHub Removes its Annoying Cookie Banners | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 27 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 21 2020, @06:22PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 21 2020, @06:22PM (#1089959)

    Safari is a POS. Get a grown up's OS while you're at it. Have some self respect!

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Flamebait=1, Funny=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   0  

  • (Score: 2) by helel on Monday December 21 2020, @08:15PM

    by helel (2949) on Monday December 21 2020, @08:15PM (#1090007)

    So would you recommend giving all my browsing history to Microsoft or Google? Perhaps letting Firefox feed every site I visit to Mindshare/GroupM is the "grown up" choice?

    Yes, I'm aware there are some more fringe choices available, but Safari respects my privacy and works well for everything except googles triple E additions to the web and I don't really consider that much of a downside.

    --
    Republican Patriotism [youtube.com]

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by Tork on Monday December 21 2020, @08:47PM (1 child)

    by Tork (3914) on Monday December 21 2020, @08:47PM (#1090024)
    Perhaps Safari's the biggest pile of trash there is, but it uses resources far more efficiently than Chrome. Given that a large portion of safari users are running from a battery of some sort, that matters.

    One place I worked at earlier this summer had to disable Chrome on loads of remote machines because its pigginess was interfering with the processes that handles screen encoding, adding latency to the UI and slowing down productivity.

    Google was a fair shade better back when they were hungry, now I feel like I'm reliving the Internet Explorer days.
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 21 2020, @10:01PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 21 2020, @10:01PM (#1090050)

      I had google chrome open for a couple of days on my laptop because a site (starbux for life) didn't open properly on FF. After a while I noticed chrome was using 100% on both cpus. Don't know WTF it was doing but I would guess mining bitcoin.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 22 2020, @01:36AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 22 2020, @01:36AM (#1090086)

    Maybe you should learn the difference between a browser and an operating system before passing out advice like this.