SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
When the church doors open, only white people will be allowed inside.
That’s the message the Asatru Folk Assembly in Murdock, Minnesota, is sending after being granted a conditional use permit to open a church there and practice its pre-Christian religion that originated in northern Europe.
Murdock council members said they do not support the church but were legally obligated to approve the permit, which they did in a 3-1 decision.
“We were highly advised by our attorney to pass this permit for legal reasons to protect the First Amendment rights," Mayor Craig Kavanagh said. "We knew that if this was going to be denied, we were going to have a legal battle on our hands that could be pretty expensive.”
City Attorney Don Wilcox said it came down to free speech and freedom of religion.
“I think there’s a great deal of sentiment in the town that they don’t want that group there," he said. "You can’t just bar people from practicing whatever religion they want or saying anything they want as long as it doesn’t incite violence.”
After permit approved for whites-only church, small Minnesota town insists it isn't racist
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 02 2021, @04:00AM
Wow. Just ... wow.
The first amendment doesn't provide for slavery. Nor child abuse. Not rape, incest, honour killings nor forced marriage.
In fact, the text is pretty clear as is the precedent on the point: a church organisation or doctrine can not excuse activity that would be otherwise illegal.
All the amendment says is that there can't be an establishment of religion, which has been interpreted to include backdoor preferences for, or restrictions on any given religion.
If you like, it's the right to be officially wrong; not to ignore other law.
Of course, the first amendment was also about freedom of speech, press and right to assemble and petition - but we already know that the leftists are dead set against those, so I suppose religion is just the cherry on top, here.