Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Monday September 29 2014, @01:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the One-word:-"plastics" dept.

Can Google’s winning ways be applied to all kinds of businesses? The authors of “How Google Works,” ( http://www.howgoogleworks.net/ ) Eric Schmidt, Google’s former chief executive, and Jonathan Rosenberg, a former senior product manager at Google, firmly believe that they can.

The critical ingredient, they argue in their new book, is to build teams, companies and corporate cultures around people they call “smart creatives.” These are digital-age descendants of yesterday’s “knowledge workers,” a term coined in 1959 by Peter Drucker, the famed management theorist.

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/28/the-google-formula-for-success/

Do people of SN agree that such success can be replicated in diverse environments, diverse cultures? Or, is Google's success one of a kind?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Buck Feta on Monday September 29 2014, @02:49PM

    by Buck Feta (958) on Monday September 29 2014, @02:49PM (#99603) Journal

    > What exactly is the "formula" for success, other than being first? All things are usually equal with talent and drive, and the successful people are usually ones who are at the right place at the right time.

    This is exactly how I feel about John Coltrane, Marie Curie, Picasso, Issac newton, Shakespeare, and Archimedes.

    --
    - fractious political commentary goes here -
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 29 2014, @03:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 29 2014, @03:05PM (#99611)

    That's a good point. One could argue that Yahoo! was actually the first to grasp the business potential of a web portal. And Google wasn't the first with text search either.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by forsythe on Monday September 29 2014, @03:10PM

    by forsythe (831) on Monday September 29 2014, @03:10PM (#99612)

    Leibniz would not appreciate your sarcasm.

    • (Score: 1) by Buck Feta on Monday September 29 2014, @03:13PM

      by Buck Feta (958) on Monday September 29 2014, @03:13PM (#99614) Journal

      Neither would Dexter Wallman.

      --
      - fractious political commentary goes here -
    • (Score: 2) by VLM on Monday September 29 2014, @03:24PM

      by VLM (445) on Monday September 29 2014, @03:24PM (#99619)

      Newton invents calc = original submarine patent

      Invents, files, keeps it secret, Leibniz invents it independently and newton's all "plagarizer!" and releases the patent lawyers with their submarine patent and 400 years later, just like SCO, they still won't give it a rest. You snooze you loose, Newton.

      Newton was a pretty cool bro-mathematician other than the whole patent trolling Leibniz thing.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 01 2014, @01:35PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 01 2014, @01:35PM (#100453)

        I remember hanging our with Newton late at night in his lab. We'd get high on fumes and try to turn lead into gold!

        Good times.