ScienceDaily reports:
Researchers say there should be an international database containing the very latest information about organ donations and transplants, so policy makers can make informed decisions on whether to adopt an opt-out or opt-in system.
The call comes after a study [in the UK], carried out by The University of Nottingham, the University of Stirling and Northumbria University, showed that overall an opt-out system might provide a greater number of organs for transplant but many factors can influence the success of either system and a repository of accessible information would help individual countries decide which one would be better for them.
The research published in the online academic journal BioMed Central Medicine (BMC Medicine), is the first international comparison that examines both deceased as well as living organ/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems.
[...] Professor Fergusson argues that it is imperative for transplant organizations to routinely collect data on important organ donation indices -- consent type, procurement procedure, number of intensive care beds and trained surgeons -- and make this publicly available to inform future research and policy recommendations.
(Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday September 30 2014, @03:20PM
> Does that mean that I can get out of the stupid nanny state laws that only serve to protect me from myself?
If you jump on the brakes and hit the rail at 45 sideways, the seat belt will allow you to walk away or at least ride off with some nice EMTs.
Do that without a belt and I'll have to pay at least 10 of the finest and bravest for three hours, so they can keep the highway shut down and piss off a few thousand of our fellow citizens...
By all means, don't wear your seat belt on small midwest/desert county roads, I totally agree that's not my problem.