SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
'No longer acceptable' for platforms to take key decisions alone, EU Commission says
It is "no longer acceptable" for social media giants to take key decisions on online content removals alone, following the high profile takedowns of US President Trump's accounts on Facebook and Twitter, the European Commission has said.
Trump's accounts have been suspended by the two platforms for inciting calls to violence ahead of the violent riots that hit Washington's Capitol Hill last week.
Speaking to lawmakers on Monday (11 January), Prabhat Agarwal, an official who heads up the eCommerce unit at the European Commission's DG Connect, noted how the EU executive's Digital Services Act attempts to realign the balance between effective content removal and preserving freedom of expression online.
"It is no longer acceptable in our view that platforms take some key decisions by themselves alone without any supervision, without any accountability, and without any sort of dialogue or transparency for the kind of decisions that they're taking," Agarwal said.
"Freedom of expression is really a key value in this," he told the European Parliament's internal market committee.
The comments came following concerns raised by some lawmakers in the European Parliament following the suspension of Trump's social media accounts. In doing so, platforms giants had demonstrated that they yield a disproportionate degree of power over the freedom of speech online.
"The fact that platforms like Twitter and Facebook decide who can speak freely is dangerous," Green MEP Kim van Sparrentak said.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by DannyB on Friday January 15 2021, @04:29PM (6 children)
Does it even seem plausible that Democrats could somehow manage to steal the election in one Republican leaning precinct / county? Let alone ALL of them.
It boggles the mind to conceive of the level of organization it would take to have such a vast number of people, in key positions, at every voting precinct. And to somehow keep this all a secret. It isn't even believable to think that Democrats, yes Democrats could manage a medium size organization, nevermind something this vast -- and in secret.
About as credible as 400,000 NASA people, and contractors, managing to keep the faked moon landings a secret for 50+ years. Without real proof of the fakery ever getting out!
Every election has had irregularities. It is common for recounts to differ by hundreds of votes. Sometimes as high as a thousand. But never enough to affect the actual outcome in the precinct being recounted.
If there is some kind of vast conspiracy to steal the election, it is upon those saying so to PROVE IT. They filed dozens of baseless lawsuits without any proof. They didn't even take their own lawsuits seriously -- they just expected a Republican judge to rubber stamp it. They didn't even produce proof of service upon defendants. Clearly bad faith in a lawsuit not even meant to be taken seriously.
If there really were a vast conspiracy to steal the election:
1. I would just LOVE to see the PROOF of it
2. I would be just as enraged as you are
So far all I've seen is claims the election was stolen. Passionate claims. Loud. Repeated. Said with a straight face. But that doesn't convince me. How was it done? Specifics? Who did it? What physical evidence is there? (This was the most camera recorded vote and recount ever!) I'm not talking about ordinary irregularities of dozens or hundreds of votes. I'm asking about what could change the outcome.
Why is it that when I hold a stick, everyone begins to look like a pinata?
(Score: 3, Funny) by DeathMonkey on Friday January 15 2021, @04:56PM (1 child)
And of course, that entire massive conspiracy was coordinated by a sleepy guy suffering from dementia...
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 17 2021, @07:33PM
Noone thinks the kid sniffer orchestrated anything. He's a reanimated corpse the puppet masters stuck on a string.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday January 15 2021, @07:45PM (3 children)
Let's just think a bit more about this massive conspiracy.
Much of America is small towns. Where everyone knows one another. Strangers are very obvious.
How would a vast conspiracy manage to infiltrate every single small town voting precinct? And keep it quiet -- 100% of the time, without fail.
How would the learn how the various checks and balances and security mechanisms work at each local voting and counting place? How would you engineer a way to flip votes or miscount votes at every one of these locations? With so many eyes (and cameras) watching?
How is it that all of these precincts certified their elections. Presumably all the local people knew who the vote counters were. Probably go to church / school / work with them. Other people (both parties) carefully watching. The local people would know who is ultimately in charge of presiding over the election, and declaring the certified outcome. And that person would know all the people he/she is communicating with about the entire process. Strangers would stick out.
How would you do this at scale in so many different small towns in so many different regions? In the mountains? The desert? The plains? Farming communities?
It boggles the mind that such a vast conspiracy could even exist, let alone be kept secret.
Why is it that when I hold a stick, everyone begins to look like a pinata?
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 15 2021, @09:24PM
"My gut feeling is that most conspiracy theorists have never been project managers. Their optimism is adorable..."
(Score: 2) by Reziac on Saturday January 16 2021, @02:24AM (1 child)
You don't need small towns, You only need about a dozen key high-population counties.
And when +1200 people are willing to sign an affidavit attesting to witnessing what they believed was fraud (remember, lying on an affidavit is a felony) seems to me those affidavits should at least be examined, whether you believe anything nefarious happened or not.
And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 17 2021, @12:00AM
Seems like it would be easier to bribe 1200 people to simply lie or stretch the truth than run a conspiracy across hundreds of different counties. As usual rightwing nuttery is projection, as evident from how Trump's accusations and lawsuits always targeted communities with larger numbers of minorities and democrats. Can't believe you nutters are still in the Qult.