Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday January 15 2021, @02:01PM   Printer-friendly

'No longer acceptable' for platforms to take key decisions alone, EU Commission says

It is "no longer acceptable" for social media giants to take key decisions on online content removals alone, following the high profile takedowns of US President Trump's accounts on Facebook and Twitter, the European Commission has said.

Trump's accounts have been suspended by the two platforms for inciting calls to violence ahead of the violent riots that hit Washington's Capitol Hill last week.

Speaking to lawmakers on Monday (11 January), Prabhat Agarwal, an official who heads up the eCommerce unit at the European Commission's DG Connect, noted how the EU executive's Digital Services Act attempts to realign the balance between effective content removal and preserving freedom of expression online.

"It is no longer acceptable in our view that platforms take some key decisions by themselves alone without any supervision, without any accountability, and without any sort of dialogue or transparency for the kind of decisions that they're taking," Agarwal said.

"Freedom of expression is really a key value in this," he told the European Parliament's internal market committee.

The comments came following concerns raised by some lawmakers in the European Parliament following the suspension of Trump's social media accounts. In doing so, platforms giants had demonstrated that they yield a disproportionate degree of power over the freedom of speech online.

"The fact that platforms like Twitter and Facebook decide who can speak freely is dangerous," Green MEP Kim van Sparrentak said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday January 15 2021, @05:29PM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday January 15 2021, @05:29PM (#1100647) Homepage
    They must treat them as very special indeed - as they don't have any, according to official reports.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by DannyB on Friday January 15 2021, @05:42PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 15 2021, @05:42PM (#1100655) Journal

    Apparently there is not a single gay person in North Korea. No, not even one.

    --
    Why is it that when I hold a stick, everyone begins to look like a pinata?
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 16 2021, @03:27PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 16 2021, @03:27PM (#1101165)

    It's it so interesting how well propaganda works?

    I don't mean Russia. I mean us. In Russia there is an average gay population, and it's no secret to anybody including politicians. There are even *gasp* gay clubs. The one and only difference between Russia and America is that in Russia it is illegal to disseminate propaganda of a sexual nature to anybody under the age of 18. So this effectively precludes any sort of gay pride march, tranny reading day at the library, or men walking around in S&M gear with other mean on leashes because these are all apparently things to do.

    To be clear though I am speaking of Russia 'proper' here. Chechnya is a part of Russia (in a way analogous to how Puerto Rico is a part of the US) and they have their own set of rules, laws, and culture. And homosexuality in Chechnya is as well tolerated as it is in any Muslim majority nation. Which is to say, it's not.