Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday January 15 2021, @02:01PM   Printer-friendly

'No longer acceptable' for platforms to take key decisions alone, EU Commission says

It is "no longer acceptable" for social media giants to take key decisions on online content removals alone, following the high profile takedowns of US President Trump's accounts on Facebook and Twitter, the European Commission has said.

Trump's accounts have been suspended by the two platforms for inciting calls to violence ahead of the violent riots that hit Washington's Capitol Hill last week.

Speaking to lawmakers on Monday (11 January), Prabhat Agarwal, an official who heads up the eCommerce unit at the European Commission's DG Connect, noted how the EU executive's Digital Services Act attempts to realign the balance between effective content removal and preserving freedom of expression online.

"It is no longer acceptable in our view that platforms take some key decisions by themselves alone without any supervision, without any accountability, and without any sort of dialogue or transparency for the kind of decisions that they're taking," Agarwal said.

"Freedom of expression is really a key value in this," he told the European Parliament's internal market committee.

The comments came following concerns raised by some lawmakers in the European Parliament following the suspension of Trump's social media accounts. In doing so, platforms giants had demonstrated that they yield a disproportionate degree of power over the freedom of speech online.

"The fact that platforms like Twitter and Facebook decide who can speak freely is dangerous," Green MEP Kim van Sparrentak said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Friday January 15 2021, @05:42PM (3 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday January 15 2021, @05:42PM (#1100656) Homepage
    Every claim of fraud that's thus far been examined has been debunked. The priori probability of any of the remaining few being the same fantasy, lies, or complete ignorance of what went on as the ones that came before is now practically 1.0. Maybe if you hadn't called "wolf" a hundred times, and just limited it to things that can't be debunked, or demonstrated as outright lies, in 2 minutes, then you might have been rewarded with some credibility, but instead you did the opposite.

    The statistically "off" things you refer to are a mixture of lies, irrelevancies, and utter lack of understanding of stats - usually a combination of all three. In particular that Shiva dude, he's a complete idiot, and all of his analyses are pure garbage.

    The people who feel they they have no say are just whiny little shits that don't understand the paradox of democracy. Only one side wins. Get over it.

    And they, by interrupting the functioning of your terribley broken democracy, are the ones who are bringing on the totalitarianism.

    It would be hard for you to be more wrong in just one paragraph even if you'd *tried*. Start your next post with "up is down. black is white. odd numbers are even. hot is cold. I've got something intelligent to say." to make sure you get off to a better start on that front.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 16 2021, @12:35AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 16 2021, @12:35AM (#1100932)

    The statistically "off" things you refer to are a mixture of lies, irrelevancies, and utter lack of understanding of stats - usually a combination of all three. In particular that Shiva dude, he's a complete idiot, and all of his analyses are pure garbage.

    Shiva, you say?

    'Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.'

    The Dance is over.

    Statistical Geniuses over here. My Gawd are they stupid! [americanlibertyreport.com]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 17 2021, @03:58AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 17 2021, @03:58AM (#1101381)

      That one has to be trolling. The lack of knowledge about how election statistics work or Virginia's historical voting record makes that sad. I almost think that had to be on purpose. The last paragraph, however, makes it hilarious in hindsight.

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday January 17 2021, @10:03AM

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Sunday January 17 2021, @10:03AM (#1101440) Homepage
      Well, there was no stats in that inane gibbering, so it can be debunked in the time it takes to scroll the mousewheel just over a screenful.

      Classic Trumpaloon behaviour, concentrated Dunning-Kruger.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves