SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
'No longer acceptable' for platforms to take key decisions alone, EU Commission says
It is "no longer acceptable" for social media giants to take key decisions on online content removals alone, following the high profile takedowns of US President Trump's accounts on Facebook and Twitter, the European Commission has said.
Trump's accounts have been suspended by the two platforms for inciting calls to violence ahead of the violent riots that hit Washington's Capitol Hill last week.
Speaking to lawmakers on Monday (11 January), Prabhat Agarwal, an official who heads up the eCommerce unit at the European Commission's DG Connect, noted how the EU executive's Digital Services Act attempts to realign the balance between effective content removal and preserving freedom of expression online.
"It is no longer acceptable in our view that platforms take some key decisions by themselves alone without any supervision, without any accountability, and without any sort of dialogue or transparency for the kind of decisions that they're taking," Agarwal said.
"Freedom of expression is really a key value in this," he told the European Parliament's internal market committee.
The comments came following concerns raised by some lawmakers in the European Parliament following the suspension of Trump's social media accounts. In doing so, platforms giants had demonstrated that they yield a disproportionate degree of power over the freedom of speech online.
"The fact that platforms like Twitter and Facebook decide who can speak freely is dangerous," Green MEP Kim van Sparrentak said.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 16 2021, @03:46PM
They are producing news shows that are presenting fantasy as fact.
Prior to this there used to be a 'hard liberal', 'hard conservative', and 'respectably neutral' slant to most news in the United States (there has always been partisan news stories published, but for most papers they had to maintain a veneer of credibility by ensuring most of their stories most of the time were factually correct.) However the past 20 years or so has seen more 'flexibility' in the mainstream stories to the point where news within an ideological bubble will all copy each other in order to ensure consistency, while the other side will present a different narrative (whether real, slanted, or factually incorrect) and the only real way to verify the facts is if you have the time, critical reading/thinking skills, and knowledge of other news networks to source your information from, say, international sources and sources with known slants to verify which narratives are correct, incorrect, biased, or unbiased.
Unfortunately many people in the US have come to worship their news media like a false idol, and are making sacrifices to it because the narratives tell them to.