Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Discuss! (v2.0)

posted by martyb on Sunday January 17 2021, @06:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the drawing-a-blank dept.

martyb writes:

This story intentionally left blank.1,2

Discuss!

[1] Soylentil Suggestion.
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentionally_blank_page.

Previously:
Discuss!

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Discuss! (v2.0) | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 216 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 18 2021, @03:29PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 18 2021, @03:29PM (#1102010)
    Of which 58 are probably political 💩 that isn’t something related to the primary focus of the site.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 18 2021, @08:26PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 18 2021, @08:26PM (#1102117)

    Of which 58 are probably political 💩 that isn’t something related to the primary focus of the site.

    That's for the editors to decide. Wouldn't you agree? ;)

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 19 2021, @02:31AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 19 2021, @02:31AM (#1102225)

      Oh ho, SN is a publisher? They should be careful otherwise they might get sued for the content posted on here.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 19 2021, @05:16AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 19 2021, @05:16AM (#1102275)

        Oh ho, SN is a publisher? They should be careful otherwise they might get sued for the content posted on here.

        I regret (well, not really) to inform you that you are wrong about section 230 [techdirt.com].