Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday January 28 2021, @10:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the dealer's-choice? dept.

Should a self-driving car kill the baby or the grandma? Depends on where you're from.:

In 2014 researchers at the MIT Media Lab designed an experiment called Moral Machine. The idea was to create a game-like platform that would crowdsource people's decisions on how self-driving cars should prioritize lives in different variations of the "trolley problem." In the process, the data generated would provide insight into the collective ethical priorities of different cultures.

The researchers never predicted the experiment's viral reception. Four years after the platform went live, millions of people in 233 countries and territories have logged 40 million decisions, making it one of the largest studies ever done on global moral preferences.

A new paper published in Nature presents the analysis of that data and reveals how much cross-cultural ethics diverge on the basis of culture, economics, and geographic location.

[...] Awad hopes the results will also help technologists think more deeply about the ethics of AI beyond self-driving cars. "We used the trolley problem because it's a very good way to collect this data, but we hope the discussion of ethics don't stay within that theme," he said. "The discussion should move to risk analysis—about who is at more risk or less risk—instead of saying who's going to die or not, and also about how bias is happening." How these results could translate into the more ethical design and regulation of AI is something he hopes to study more in the future.

"In the last two, three years more people have started talking about the ethics of AI," Awad said. "More people have started becoming aware that AI could have different ethical consequences on different groups of people. The fact that we see people engaged with this—I think that that's something promising."

Journal Reference:
Edmond Awad, Sohan Dsouza, Richard Kim, et al. The Moral Machine experiment, Nature (DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 28 2021, @12:04PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 28 2021, @12:04PM (#1106022)

    Especially in inclement conditions where there is a high probability of pedestrians being present.

    But if self driving cars always followed speed limits then how would government be able to give speeding tickets? They won't! Lost Revenue!! THE HORRORS!!!!!!!

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Funny=1, Touché=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 28 2021, @12:07PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 28 2021, @12:07PM (#1106024)

    and think about it. No one would have to go to driving school anymore and so driving schools would lose money. No, we can't let this happen! Government must protect jobs!!

    • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Thursday January 28 2021, @05:26PM (2 children)

      by Grishnakh (2831) on Thursday January 28 2021, @05:26PM (#1106170)

      Driving schools don't employ very many people, and they're not public servants, so no one cares about them.

      However, driverless cars threaten the jobs of countless police officers, who "put their lives on the line every day" to protect us by giving us speeding tickets, and we just can't have this. I honestly don't know how governments are going to handle driverless cars because of this factor. If the cars are all driverless, how are the police supposed to pull over random black people and give them bogus tickets, or use it as an excuse to shoot them if they reach for their wallet to get their ID?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2021, @02:07AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2021, @02:07AM (#1106430)

        That's easy, just post a speed limit sign with a background pattern the that makes the car misread it but looks normal to humans, then come screaming in lights and sirens blazing. When the self driving car fails to stop (because your 'I'm a cop' transponder was mysteriously 'malfunctioning'), run it off the road and shoot the passengers. Because they are obviously terrorists. Just keeping the people safe, ya know.

        I really wish I was joking.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2021, @06:46AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 29 2021, @06:46AM (#1106500)

        Funny thing happened to a local council here. They got most of their revenue from parking fines. Kept ramping up the fines, making the timing restrictions weirder and employing more arseholes to wander round handing out tickets. Then they hit some some sort of tipping point - the more careful most people were, the more likely violators were to get fined. If you violated a parking law you would get fined, and the fines were large enough to deter almost everyone. Overnight, revenue dropped to practically zero and nearly bankrupted them.

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday January 28 2021, @06:12PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 28 2021, @06:12PM (#1106187) Journal

      Classes on driving can be replaced by classes on gender studies, communications, and marketing.

      --
      If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious