Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

So Long Lotus 1-2-3: IBM Ceases Support after over 30 Years of Code

posted by LaminatorX on Friday October 03 2014, @10:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the 3-2-1 dept.

AnonTechie writes:

On Tuesday, with no fanfare, IBM closed the last chapter in the life of one of the most iconic early computer programs, Lotus 1-2-3, when it withdrew support for the final build of the software.

IBM Lotus 123 Millennium Edition, IBM Lotus SmartSuite 9.x, and Organizer have now officially all passed their end of life support date and, according to IBM's website, "No service extensions will be offered" ( http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=ca&infotype=an&appname=iSource&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS913-091 ) – not that anyone is seriously using the spreadsheet any more.

It's a sadly muted end for what was, at one time, the world's premier spreadsheet. Lotus 1-2-3 was one of the first applications that made IBM's original PC a serious business tool, but it fell by the wayside due to poor coding decisions, failure to adapt, and the crushing tactics of Microsoft.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/02/so_long_lotus_123_ibm_ceases_support_after_over_30_years_of_code/

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
So Long Lotus 1-2-3: IBM Ceases Support after over 30 Years of Code | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 28 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by MrGuy on Friday October 03 2014, @03:11PM

    by MrGuy (1007) on Friday October 03 2014, @03:11PM (#101407)

    IBM embraced Linux because they saw it as an opportunity to sell products and services on top of Linux, not out of altruism.

    And you're wrong on IVM's relationship to SCO. SCO are the ones who sued IBM, alleging IBM illegally contributed Unix copyrighted code (which SCO purported to own) to Linux. IBM fought back vigorouslly on a number of fronts, validating the concept of OSS. But they didn't give away IP or assert any against SCO. The shovel they would have buried SCO with was that SCO never owned the Unix copyrights in the first place.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   3  

  • (Score: 2) by jcross on Friday October 03 2014, @09:57PM

    by jcross (4009) on Friday October 03 2014, @09:57PM (#101525)

    You're absolutely right they're not doing it out of altruism, but according to their website they have over 600 devs working on over 100 open source projects, which is a pretty significant contribution in my book. Even though it's done for profit, I'm still grateful.

    It's also true that SCO attacked first, but IBM did use some of their patent portfolio in the counterclaims. It was a small part of a bigger strategy, but still.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_v._IBM#IBM_counterclaims_against_SCO [wikipedia.org]